![]() 1,077,423,000 visitors served. |
|
![]() Dictionary/ thesaurus | ![]() Medical dictionary | ![]() Legal dictionary | ![]() Financial dictionary | ![]() Acronyms | ![]() Idioms | ![]() Encyclopedia | ![]() Wikipedia encyclopedia | ? |
admissible evidence |
Also found in: Wikipedia | 0.26 sec. |
|
admissible evidence n. evidence which the trial judge finds is useful in helping the trier of fact (a jury if there is a jury, otherwise the judge), and which cannot be objected to on the basis that it is irrelevant, immaterial, or violates the rules against hearsay and other objections. Sometimes the evidence which a person tries to introduce has little relevant value (usually called probative value) in determining some fact, or prejudice from the jury's shock at gory details may outweigh that probative value. In criminal cases the courts tend to be more restrictive on letting the jury hear such details for fear they will result in "undue prejudice." Thus, the jury may only hear a sanitized version of the facts in prosecutions involving violence. (See: evidence) How to thank TFD for its existence? Tell a friend about us, add a link to this page, add the site to iGoogle, or visit webmaster's page for free fun content. |
|
? References in periodicals archive |
|---|
The North Carolina Supreme Court has expressly rejected the federal standard for admissibility of scientific evidence established by the U. Judicial interpretation and application of this test are then used to examine the potential admissibility of scientific evidence in pesticide exposure cases, assuming that the requirements of the first prong -- valid scientific knowledge -- have been met. The Supreme Court reversed and held that only the Federal Rules of Evidence should be used to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence. |
| Free Tools: |
For surfers:
Browser extension |
Word of the Day |
Help
For webmasters: Free content | Linking | Lookup box | Double-click lookup | Partner with us |
|
|---|