![]() 1,082,326,624 visitors served. |
|
![]() Dictionary/ thesaurus | ![]() Medical dictionary | ![]() Legal dictionary | ![]() Financial dictionary | ![]() Acronyms | ![]() Idioms | ![]() Encyclopedia | ![]() Wikipedia encyclopedia | ? |
District court |
Also found in: Dictionary/thesaurus, Wikipedia | 0.06 sec. |
|
A designation of an inferior state court that exercises general jurisdiction that it has been granted by the constitution or statute which created it. A U.S. judicial tribunal with original jurisdiction to try cases or controversies that fall within its limited jurisdiction. A state district might, for example, determine civil actions between state residents based upon contract violations or tortious conduct that occurred within the state. Federal district courts are located in places designated by federal law, hearing cases in at least one place in every state. Most federal cases, whether civil actions or criminal prosecutions for violations of federal law, commence in district court. Cases arising under the Constitution, federal law, or treaty, or cases between citizens of different states, must also involve an interest worth more than $75,000 before the district court can exercise its jurisdiction. The federal district courts also have original and exclusive jurisdiction of Bankruptcy cases, and admiralty, maritime, and prize cases, which determine rights in ships and cargo captured at sea. State courts are powerless to hear these kinds of controversies. A party can appeal a decision made in district court in the Court of Appeal. Cross-referencesdistrict court n. 1) in the federal court system, a trial court for federal cases in a court district, which is all or a portion of a state. 2) a local court in some states. (See: court) DISTRICT COURT. The name of one of the courts of the United States. It is held by a judge, called the district judge. Several courts under the same name have been established by state authority. Vide Courts of the United States. How to thank TFD for its existence? Tell a friend about us, add a link to this page, add the site to iGoogle, or visit webmaster's page for free fun content. |
|
? References in periodicals archive |
|---|
A district court judge backed the County's practice in the case of Sanchez v. District Court Judge Clarence Cooper ruled in 2005 that the evolution disclaimer is a violation of the separation of church and state and ordered the stickers removed from the district's biology textbooks. District Court judge in Seattle agreed and told the EPA to consult with another federal agency - the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency's Fisheries Division. |
| Free Tools: |
For surfers:
Browser extension |
Word of the Day |
Help
For webmasters: Free content | Linking | Lookup box | Double-click lookup | Partner with us |
|
|---|