Libertarianism

(redirected from Libertarians)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Financial, Encyclopedia.
Related to Libertarians: liberty, liberalism, Libertarian capitalism

Libertarianism

A political philosophy that advocates free will, individual rights, and voluntary cooperation.

The core doctrine of libertarianism begins with the recognition that people have certain natural rights and that deprivation of these rights is immoral. Among these natural rights are the right to personal autonomy and property rights, and the right to the utilization of previously unused resources. These two basic assumptions form the foundation of all libertarian ideals.

Libertarianism can be traced back to ancient China, where philosopher Lao-tzu advocated the recognition of individual liberties. The modern libertarian theory emerged in the sixteenth century through the writings of Etienne de La Boetie (1530–1563), an eminent French theorist. In the seventeenth century, John Locke and a group of British reformers known as the Levellers fashioned the classical basis for libertarianism with well-received philosophies on human nature and economics. Since the days of Locke, libertarianism has attracted pacifists, utopianists, utilitarianists, anarchists, and fascists. This wide array of support demonstrates the accessibility and elasticity of the libertarian promotion of natural rights.

Essential to the notion of natural rights is respect for the natural rights of others. Without a dignified population, voluntary cooperation is impossible. According to the libertarian, the means to achieving a dignified population and voluntary cooperation is inextricably tied to the promotion of natural rights.

Libertarianism holds that people lose their dignity as government gains control of their body and their life. The Abdication of natural rights to government prevents people from living in their own way and working and producing at their own pace. The result is a decrease in self-reliance and independence, which results in a decrease in personal dignity, which in turn depresses society and necessitates more government interference.

Thus, the libertarian views government as both the cause and the effect of societal ills. Government is the cause of crime and prejudice because it robs people of their independence and frustrates initiative and creativity. Then, having created the sources of crime and prejudice by depriving individuals of their natural rights, government attempts to exorcise the evils with more controls over natural rights.

Libertarians believe that government should be limited to the defense of its citizens. Actions such as murder, rape, Robbery, theft, Embezzlement, Fraud, Arson, Kidnapping, Battery, Trespass, and Pollution violate the rights of others, so government control of these actions is legitimate. Libertarians acknowledge human imperfection and the resulting need for some government deterrence and punishment of violence, Nuisance, and harassment. However, government control of human activity should be limited to these functions.

Further readings

Boaz, David. 1997. Libertarianism: A Primer. New York: Free Press.

Otsuka, Michael. 2003. Libertarianism Without Inequality. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Cross-references

Anarchism; Independent Parties; Natural Law; Utilitarianism.

References in periodicals archive ?
Why would libertarians want "capitalism" if they thought it was a disaster either for liberty or for welfare (both possibilities seem conceivable to me)?
He said Paul appeals to privacy-minded libertarians while Cruz appeals to those who want a strict adherence to the Constitution.
If the Supreme Court agrees to review the constitutionality of state bans on gay marriage this term, expect libertarians again to favor gay rights.
Since 1996, the most nuanced response to that question has been Jeffrey Rogers Hummel's Emancipating Slaves, Enslaving Free Men (Open Court), a study of the Civil War that drew praise from academic historians for its scholarly rigor and from radical libertarians for its uncompromising critique of both the Union and the Confederacy.
On Sunday, 2013 SFL Student of the Year award winner, Noelle Mandell will discuss why young people matter and how Libertarians can work to attract/engage the next generation, and will also facilitate a hands-on exercise in activism.
Though philosophical differences--and policy differences--do separate libertarians from traditionalists, the acrimony that long characterized their interactions was never a matter of principle but a historical accident, the upshot of personal feuds and the polarizing atmosphere of the 1960s and '70s.
A: What we find is that libertarians are by far the highest on systemizing and by far the lowest on empathizing.
There are, he suggests, three varieties of libertarians: classical liberals, hard libertarians, and neoclassical liberals.
And that is not in the tradition of the New Hampshire Libertarian Party.
However, in Free Market Fairness, Tomasi claims to be addressing not merely high liberals, but libertarians as well.
The academic members of the libertarian cadre must devote their lives to advancing liberty as well as to assisting other libertarians in advancing the cause in academia.
Simply put, Libertarians don't think Uncle Sam should dictate what people can or cannot do in the privacy of their homes or places of work.