(redirected from Logical fallacies)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Encyclopedia.
References in periodicals archive ?
To expose the defense expert's logical fallacies, the plaintiff attorney and expert must explain why a person can be significantly injured in a low-speed crash.
First, we taught students to avoid using logical fallacies, such as the either/or fallacy: the fallacy that says things like "we can have tax cuts OR spending on child poverty; we can have freedom of expression OR protection for children from pornography and pedophiles.
Kuehne demonstrates that even though such logical fallacies were gradually losing favor among Massachusetts' increasingly diverse religious population, Congregationalist ministers were not willing to fully embrace and inculcate Lockean concepts of the rights of conscience.
Logical fallacies are arguments that are so weak that the premises, or the reasons, do not support the conclusion or their conclusion is based on invalid assumptions.
Students in Logic 101 learn that begging the question--assuming as true a question whose truth is yet to be argued--is the first of the logical fallacies.
Slipping the word 'denial' in is of course meant to associate sceptics with Holocaust denial because global warming alarmists have nothing to contribute to the debate other than name-calling and other logical fallacies.
Examples abound, logical fallacies are elucidated and thoroughly analyzed, and rules of inference are detailed.
There are also two great references: 25 of the most common logical fallacies adapted from Bo Bennett's concise introductory work “Logically… Fallacious: The Ultimate Collection of Over 300 Logical Fallacies” and 36 theist arguments (and why they are flawed) adapted from Rebecca Newberger Goldstein's wonderful novel “36 Arguments for the Existence of God.
It's a graphic called "Thou Shalt Not Commit Logical Fallacies," and nothing could be handier during this season of rhetorical hyperbole.
Victor Stenger is an intelligent person, so I am puzzled why he wrote a book with so many logical fallacies.
It respectfully disagrees with religious belief, exposes logical fallacies that are common on both sides of the debate, and models the social discourse the authors believe is necessary for genuine tolerance and religious freedom.
27 letter, employing logical fallacies and a shallow grasp of history.