Sales Tax

(redirected from Retail sales tax)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Financial, Acronyms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.

Sales Tax

A state or local-level tax on the retail sale of specified property or services. It is a percentage of the cost of such. Generally, the purchaser pays the tax but the seller collects it as an agent for the government. Various taxing jurisdictions allow exemptions for purchases of specified items, including certain foods, services, and manufacturing equipment. If the purchaser and seller are in different states, a use tax usually applies.

The vast majority of states impose sales taxes on their residents. The only exceptions are Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon. Some states rely more heavily on sales taxes for a significant portion of revenue. Tennessee, for instance, does not impose an Income Tax, so it relies heavily on sales taxes. The combined state and local sales taxes average about 9.25 percent per sale. The state of Michigan imposes a six percent sales tax, which accounts for about 28 percent of the state's total revenue. In 2002, the state collected $6.5 billion in sales taxes.

States have faced a long struggle to collect sales and taxes from retailers that are based outside the state and have no contacts with the state seeking to collect taxes. This is particularly true of companies that sell goods through mail orders or on the Internet. Even if an out-of-state retailer is not required to pay sales taxes within a state, the purchaser is nevertheless required to pay the sales tax on goods and services purchased through the Internet or by mail order. However, states rarely collect these taxes from the purchasers. According to a study by researchers at the University of Tennessee, states and cities in the United States lost an estimated $13.3 billion in uncollected sales taxes in 2001.

The U.S. Supreme Court has addressed the issue of states requiring out-of-state retailers to pay sales taxes on several occasions. In Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady, 430 U.S. 274, 97 S. Ct. 1076, 51 L. Ed. 2d 326 (1977), the Court required a showing of a "substantial nexus" between a taxing state and the company providing goods and services before the taxing state can require the company to pay taxes. Without this substantial nexus, a state that taxes an outof-state retailer has violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Subsequently, the Court applied this test to a case involving a state's attempt to tax a mail order company. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298, 112 S. Ct. 1904, 119 L. Ed. 2d 91 (1992). In Quill Corp., the state of North Dakota sought a Declaratory Judgment that Quill Corporation, which had is main offices in Illinois, California, and Georgia, was required to pay taxes on sales with North Dakota customers. Quill had no outlets or any sales representatives in North Dakota, though it received $1 million of its annual $200 million in sales nationally from the state. The Court held that North Dakota could not tax Quill because Quill did not have a substantial nexus with the state.

In order to address the problems associated with the collection of sales taxes on the Internet, the National Governors Association drafted the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement, whereby states would agree to modify their sales and use tax laws to a more uniform structure. Thirty-one state representatives signed the agreement, though individual state legislatures would have to modify their tax statutes to conform. The agreement is designed to remove complications among the sales and use tax laws in the different states and to eliminate the potential for double taxation. Several commentators, however, have noted that such an arrangement could violate the Commerce Clause based on the decisions in Quill Corp., Brady, and similar cases.

Further readings

Abrahms, Doug, and Brian Tumulty. 2003. "Legislators Consider Internet Tax." Herald Dispatch. Available online at <www.herald-dispatch.com/2003/January/28/LNtop1.htm> (accessed August 10, 2003).

Chi, Keon S. 2000. Electronic Commerce: Revenue Implications for States. Lexington, Ky.: Council of State Governments.

Due, John Fitzgerald. 1994. Sales Taxation: State and Local Structure and Administration. 2d ed. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.

Murray, Matthew N., and William F. Fox, eds. 1997. The Sales Tax in the 21st Century. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.

Cross-references

Taxation.

References in periodicals archive ?
Any state tax reformer hoping to adopt a European-style value-added tax or a broad-based retail sales tax that reaches all household consumption must contend with this fundamental legal hurdle standing in the way of such reform.
Also, the city is working on slicing an increment from that problematic retail sales tax for downtown redevelopment use.
Table 1 Memphis Top Ten Retail Sales Tax Collections by Sector, FY 2001 and FY 2002 Memphis Local Option Sales & Use Tax Collections, Accrual Data, July-June Sector FY 2001 FY 2002 % Change Eating & Drinking Places $ 17,548,130 $ 17,758,687 + 1.
You'll pay 8% retail sales tax in Ontario, but 7% in Manitoba.
Although the International Monetary Fund has insisted that a retail sales tax be imposed, there are indications the scheme, which allows traders to pay a fixed tax on turnover, may become more permanent.
The beauty of the National Retail Sales Tax is its simplicity and fairness.
This section also contains passable explanations of how to provide appropriate information on tax reform, a look at a Federal retail sales tax, and the impact that fundamental tax reform would have on our economy.
Archer favors a consumption tax, such as a national retail sales tax, which eliminates the role of the IRS and helps savers at all income levels accumulate wealth.
That, in part, is why Washington must turn to a simpler, more visible, economically efficient tax: a national retail sales tax.
7 percent compared to the same period in 1992, and retail sales tax receipts grew substantially through the year.
In turn, Bill 30 -- the Retail Sales Tax Amendment, 1993 -- which was drafted to implement these measures, was given first reading on June 1, 1993.
If you write off an account, don't forget to make the proper claims to get your GST and retail sales tax back.