Straw Man

(redirected from Straw man argument)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Financial.
Related to Straw man argument: fallacy, Slippery slope fallacy

Straw Man

An individual who acts as a front for others who actually incur the expense and obtain the profit of a transaction.

In the terminology employed by real estate dealers, a straw man is an individual who acts as a conduit for convenience in holding and transferring title to the property involved. For example, such a person might act as an agent for another in order to take title to real property and execute whatever documents and instruments the principal directs with respect to the transaction.

straw man

n. 1) a person to whom title to property or a business interest is transferred for the sole purpose of concealing the true owner and/or the business machinations of the parties. Thus, the straw man has no real interest or participation but is merely a passive stand-in for a real participant who secretly controls activities. Sometimes a straw man is involved when the actual owner is not permitted to act, such as a person with a criminal record holding a liquor license. 2) an argument which is intended to distract the other side from the real issues or waste the opponent's time and effort, sometimes called a "red herring" (for the belief that drawing a fish across a trail will mislead hunting dogs).

Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
She also relies heavily on setting up and knocking down straw man arguments, making false claims about what "gun owners" believe, and then debunking those supposed beliefs with statistics from her preferred, anti-gun researchers.
Tasmanians should also be prepared for embattled leader Bryan Green to say and do anything for his own political self-interest, with more false claims - like the non-existent RHH "illness cluster and Basslink being "fried''; straw man arguments such as how not selling the Tamar Valley Power Station somehow caused a drought and Basslink to break, as well as outrageous personal slurs.
As Case observes, politicians can be masters at engaging in straw man arguments, which, she writes, "in addition to being logically invalid, function to keep people from paying attention to the evidence.