behaviorism

(redirected from behaviourism)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Encyclopedia.
Related to behaviourism: Cognitivism
See: casuistry
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
Whilst behaviourists like Skinner and Watson worked in the fields of psychology and psychiatry, they wanted behaviourism to be the basis for managing and shaping the behaviour of patients, employees, students, trainees and whole societies.
The popularity of behaviourism as a force in psychology and psychiatry has waned (owing largely to later work demonstrating its gross over-simplification of the origins of human behaviour), but many of its principles remain firmly embedded in the educational system and can be seen in action in training rooms across the country.
But Mills's account of the birth of radical behaviourism, its early demise and revival in neobehaviourism and, eventually, its pretence to behavioural science and social engineering, finds its locus in the institutionalization of American psychology.
Mills astutely uncovers the influence of this unnamed behaviourism on realist turn in American philosophy.
Because radical behaviourism does not assume that behaviour counts as evidence of something else, the person is a unity rather than a duality, an interactive part of its environment rather than a contained and separate entity.
Tolman was unhappy with Watson's stimulus-response psychology then in vogue and proposed a new behaviourism that would come somewhere between introspectionism and the newly dominant stimulus-response psychology.
The basic premiss underlying behaviourism is that behaviour is a function of its consequences and is learned[23].
However, no study was found in the literature specifically pertaining to the buyer-seller interaction which adopted the strict theoretical position of behaviourism.
It should be evident that behaviourism has played a key role in human resource development (HRD), given that the focus on behaviour is significant because changes in performance do not occur, without relevant behavioural changes.
However, the cognitive learning account has proved to be a much needed and useful step beyond 'pure' behaviourism.
Looking again at Schnaitter's (1987) criteria, we soon find that the distinctions between the stipulated tasks of behaviourism and cognitivism are blurred.
More than once, Skinner's hypothesizing touched cognitive phenomena, and it is often said that one of the things that makes radical behaviourism radical is its acceptance of thinking as behaviour (cf.