breach 1) n. literally, a break. A breach may be a failure to perform a contract (breaking its terms), failure to do one's duty (breach of duty, or breach of trust), causing a disturbance, threatening, or other violent acts which break public tranquility (breach of peace), illegally entering property (breach of close), not telling the truth--knowingly or innocently--about title to property (breach of warranty), or, in past times, refusal to honor a promise to marry (breach of promise). 2) v. the act of failing to perform one's agreement, breaking one's word, or otherwise actively violating one's duty to others. (See: breach of contract, breach of the peace, breach of promise, breach of warranty)
BREACH, contract, torts. The violation of an obligation, engagement or duty;
as a breach of covenant is the non-performance or violation of a covenant;
the breach of a promise is non-performance of a promise; the breach of a
duty, is the refusal or neglect to execute an office or public trust,
according to law.
2. Breaches of a contract are single or continuing breaches. The former
are those which are committed at one single time. Skin. 367; Carth. 289. A
continuing breach is one committed at different times, as, if a covenant to
repair be broken at one time, and the same covenant be again broken, it is a
continuing breach. Moore, 242; 1 Leon. 62; 1 Salk. 141; Holt, 178; Lord
Raym. 1125. When a covenant running with the land is assigned after a single
breach, the right of action for such breach does not pass to the assignee
but if it be assigned after the commencement of a continuing breach, the
right of action then vests in such assignee. Cro. Eliz. 863; 8 Taunt. 227;,
2 Moore, 164; 1 Leon. 62.
3. In general the remedy for breaches of contracts, or quasi contracts,
is by a civil action.
BREACH. pleading. That part of the declaration in which the violation of the
defendant's contract is stated.
2. It is usual in assumpsit to introduce the statement of the
particular breach, with the allegation that the defendant, contriving and
fraudulently intending craftily and subtilely to deceive and defraud the
plaintiff, neglected and refused to perform, or performed the particular act
contrary to the previous stipulation. ?
3. In debt, the breach or cause of action. complained of must proceed
only for the non-payment of money previously alleged to be payable; and such
breach is nearly similar, whether the action be in debt on simple contract,
specially, record or statute, and is usually of the following form: " Yet
the said defendant, although often requested so to, do, hath not as yet paid
the said sum of ____ dollars, above demanded, nor any part thereof, to the
said plaintiff, but bath hitherto wholly neglected and refused so to do, to
the damage of the said plaintiff _________ dollars, and therefore he brings
suit," &c.
4. The breach must obviously be governed by the nature of the
stipulation; it ought to be assigned in the words of the contract, either
negatively or affirmatively, or in words which are co-extensive with its
import and effect. Com. Dig. Pleader, C 45 to 49; 2 Saund. 181, b, c; 6
Cranch, 127; and see 5 John. R. 168; 8 John. R. 111; 7 John. R. 376; 4 Dall.
436; 2 Hen. & Munf. 446.
5. When the contract is in the disjunctive, as, on a promise to deliver
a horse by a particular day, or pay a sum of money, the breach ought to be
assigned that the defendant did not do the one act nor the other. 1 Sid.
440; Hardr. 320; Com. Dig. Pleader, C.