| Dictionary, Encyclopedia and Thesaurus - The Free Dictionary 1,775,446,368 visitors served. |
|
Dictionary/ thesaurus | Medical dictionary | Legal dictionary | Financial dictionary | Acronyms | Idioms | Encyclopedia | Wikipedia encyclopedia | ? |
indispensable party |
Also found in: Wikipedia | 0.01 sec. |
|
An individual who has an interest in the substantive issue of a legal action of such a nature that a final decree cannot be handed down without that interest being affected or without leaving the controversy in a condition whereby its final determination would be totally Unconscionable. For example, a Husband and Wife seeking to dissolve a marriage are indispensable parties to their own Divorce action. indispensable party n. a person or entity which must be included in a law suit so that the court can make a final judgment or order that will conclude the controversy. Example: Ned Neighbor brings an action to enforce his claimed right to cross the property of Oliver and Olivia Owner, but only names Oliver as a defendant. To make it possible for the court to order the property owners to honor Ned's easement, Olivia as a co-owner is an indispensable party. The procedural solution is for Neighbor to amend his complaint or petition to join Olivia as a defendant. indispensable party noun added party, compullory defendant, compulsory party, critical added party, essential party, imperative party, mandatory party, obligatory party, required party, requisite party, vital party Associated concepts: indispensable party to an action, mooion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party How to thank TFD for its existence? Tell a friend about us, add a link to this page, add the site to iGoogle, or visit webmaster's page for free fun content. |
|
| ? Mentioned in | ? References in periodicals archive | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| s Motion to Add an Indispensable Party be, and the same is hereby, DENIED. 95-8325-CIV-RYSKAMP for failure to join an indispensable party and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. In September 1993, the action for a declaratory judgment was dismissed on the grounds that Johns Hopkins was an indispensable party not before the Court and beyond its jurisdiction and that CellPro's challenge of the patents should be continued elsewhere. |
| Legal Dictionary |
| Free Tools: |
For surfers:
Free toolbar & extensions |
Word of the Day |
Help
For webmasters: Free content | Linking | Lookup box | Double-click lookup | Partner with us |
|---|