refusal of consent

References in periodicals archive ?
The Children's Act [1] does not mention refusal of consent by children, apart from the implication regarding children who suffer from a disability or chronic illness (section 11(3)).
United States ignored Morgan's explicit refusal of consent, suggesting that it was reasonable that once Morgan was within the grasp of base personnel, he could not reasonably expect to leave without their permission.
Made clear in the judgment is the recourse physicians have if they believe that continuing life support is not in the best interests of the patient: application to the Ontario Consent and Capacity Board to determine if the substitute decision-maker's refusal of consent meets the principles outlined in section 21 of the Act (i.
But an appeal against the refusal of consent for a takeaway at shop premises at 296 Birchington Avenue, Eston, was successful.
But the Planning Inspectorate's decision in September, which rejected Tesco's appeal against the refusal of consent for their first set of plans, said making deliveries using a vehicle parked at the front of the building was "far from ideal".
The court ruled that the information given by his father regarding the preference for and effectiveness of herbal therapy was wrong, and the minor's refusal of consent was not an informed one.
If a patient has decided that they do not want particular live-saving treatment in the event of an emergency and carry this information with them, then doctors must follow it as it is a refusal of consent that overrides the emergency.
On application by the hospital, the Review Panel has the power to authorize the treatment if it considers it to be in the best interests of the patient, notwithstanding the refusal of consent by the competent patient (or if incompetent, the refusal of consent by the nearest relative).
Based upon this, the Supreme Court held "that a warrantless search of a shared dwelling for evidence over the express refusal of consent by a physically present resident cannot be justified as reasonable as to him on the basis of consent given to the police by another resident.
Also in Caerphilly county, planning inspectors dismissed an appeal against the refusal of consent to build houses north of Upper North Road, Bargoed, because it would result in the loss of an attractive area of open land.
Planning officers had recommended refusal of consent for the proposed store, but councillors deferred a decision to allow further talks between Hypervalue and representatives of Swift, the integrated transport consortium of local authorities.