Adjoining Landowners

Adjoining Landowners

Those persons, such as next-door and backyard neighbors, who own lands that share common boundaries and therefore have mutual rights, duties, and liabilities.

The reciprocal rights and obligations of adjoining landowners existed at Common Law but have been modified by various state laws and court decisions.

Rights, Duties, and Liabilities

Landowners are expected to use their property reasonably without unduly interfering with the rights of the owners of contiguous land. Anything that a person does that appropriates adjoining land or substantially deprives an adjoining owner of the reasonable enjoyment of his or her property is an unlawful use of one's property. A man buys a house in a residentially zoned area and converts it into an office building. He paves the backyard for a parking lot but encroaches two feet beyond his property into the lot of the adjoining landowner. His use of the property is unlawful for a number of reasons. He has appropriated his neighbor's land and substantially interfered with his neighbor's right to use it. His neighbor may sue him in a tort action for the Nuisance created and, if successful, the neighbor will be awarded damages and an Injunction to stop the unlawful use of the land. In addition, the purchaser has violated Zoning laws by using residential property for commercial purposes without seeking a variance.

Property owners have the right to grade or change the level of their land or to build foundations or embankments as long as proper precautions are taken, such as building a retaining wall to prevent soil from spilling upon adjoining land. If permitted by law, landowners may blast on their own property but will be liable for damages caused by debris thrown onto adjoining land.

Lateral Support A landowner has a legally enforceable right to lateral support from an adjoining landowner. Lateral support is the right to have one's land in its natural condition held in place from the sides by the neighboring land so that it will not fall away. Land is considered in its natural condition if it has no artificial structures or buildings on it. A landowner can enforce the right to lateral support in court. A lawsuit for the removal of lateral support accrues when the damage occurs, not when the excavation is done.

An adjoining landowner who excavates close to his or her boundary line has a duty to prevent injury arising from the removal of the lateral support of a neighbor's property. Because the right to lateral support is considered an absolute property right, an adjoining landowner will be liable for damages to the natural condition of the land regardless of whether or not he or she acted negligently.

When, however, a landowner has erected buildings on the land, his or her right to recover for deprivation of the lateral support is different. Since additional weight has been placed on the land, thus increasing the burden on the lateral support, the landowner can be awarded damages for injuries to the building caused by excavation only if his or her neighbor has been negligent. Sometimes local ordinances require that persons planning to excavate on their own property give notice to neighboring adjoining landowners so that neighbors may take preventive measures to protect their property. The failure of landowners who receive notice to take precautions does not necessarily absolve the excavator of liability for Negligence. If, however, the excavator does not notify neighboring landowners, courts have treated this failure as negligence, and the excavator will be responsible for damages even though the excavating itself was not done negligently.

When evidence establishes that an adjoining landowner has removed the lateral support of a neighbor's land, the neighbor will recover damages in the amount of either the cost of restoring the property to its value before its support was removed or the cost of restoring the land to its former condition, whichever is less. An injunction prohibiting further excavation may be granted if it poses a clear danger to contiguous lands and if it will cause irreparable damage.

Subjacent Support A landowner is entitled to subjacent support, the absolute right to have one's land supported from beneath its surface. If one person owns the surface of the land while another owns the subjacent surface, the owner of the surface is entitled to have it remain in its natural condition without subsidence caused by the subsurface owner's withdrawal of subjacent materials. An adjoining landowner who, during excavation, taps a subterranean stream, causing the soil of the neighbor's land to subside, will be liable for any injuries that result. The surface owner's right to sue the subsurface owner for deprivation of subjacent support arises when the land actually subsides, not when the excavation is made.

The construction of buildings on the surface of the land does not lessen a person's right to subjacent support. It does, however, change the circumstances under which that person may recover for the removal of subsurface support. If such buildings are damaged, their owner must show that the removal of the support was done negligently.

Light, Air, and View No landowner has an absolute right to light and air from or passing over adjoining property or to a view over adjoining lands. Zoning laws imposed by localities may, however, require that any construction undertaken by an individual not deprive an adjoining landowner of adequate air, light, and view. Similarly, many agreements such as restrictive covenants in deeds or easements affect a person's duty toward his or her next-door neighbor's right to air, light, and view. In the absence of zoning laws or agreements, therefore, a person may build on his or her own property without regard to the fact that he or she is depriving the next-door neighbor of the light, air, and view that was enjoyed before the building was erected. An exception is a structure that blocks air, light, and view for the sole purpose of injuring a neighbor—such as a "spite" fence—and which is of no beneficial use or pleasure to the owner. Courts will generally not permit such structures.

Encroachments An encroachment is an intrusion upon the property of another without that person's permission. No person is legally entitled to construct buildings or other structures so that any part, regardless of size, extends beyond that person's property line and intrudes upon adjoining lands. An encroaching owner can be required to remove the eaves of a building that overhang an adjoining lot. If he or she refuses to do so, the owner of the contiguous lot may personally remove as much of the encroachment that deprives him or her of the complete enjoyment of his or her land, but if negligent, he or she will be liable for damages. Should any expenses be incurred in the removal of the encroachment from the adjoining land, the person whose property was encroached upon can sue the owner to recover damages.

The person whose property has been encroached upon may sue the encroacher under either the theory of nuisance or the theory of Trespass to obtain monetary damages, or instead, may seek an injunction against continuation of the encroachment or to force its removal.

Trees and Shrubs Landowners should not permit trees or hedges on their property to invade the rights of adjoining landowners. If an individual knows, for example, that a tree on his or her property is decayed and may fall and damage the property of another, that individual has a duty to eliminate the danger. A tree on the boundary line of contiguous land belongs to both adjoining landowners. Each owner has an interest identical with the portion standing on his or her land. Each can sever intruding tree branches or roots at the boundary line of his or her property, whether or not any injuries have been sustained by the intrusion, but reasonable care must be exercised so as not to kill the entire tree.

Further readings

Barlow, John R., II, and Donald M. Von Cannon. 1997. Skelton on the Legal Elements of Boundaries & Adjacent Properties 2d ed. Charlottesville, Va.: Lexis Law.

Jex, Thomas D. 1998. "If You Mow or Water Your Next-Door-Neighbor's Yard, You Might Be Liable for Anyone Injured There." BYU Journal of Public Law 13 (winter).

Merrill, Karen R. 2002. Public Lands and Political Meaning: Ranchers, the Government, and the Property between Them. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

Perin, Constance. 1977. Everything in Its Place: Social Order and Land Use in America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.

Schepens, Ana Boswell. 1999. "Prospecting for Oil at the Court House: Recovery for Drainage Caused by Secondary Recovery Operations." Alabama Law Review 50 (winter).


Land-Use Control.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Some adjoining landowners in the City of Watertown have a long-standing dispute over who must pay to construct and maintain partition fencing between their properties.
"Adjoining landowners would have been able to lease SITLA land under the program, too."
Although most of the land under Swan Lake is owned by the state, adjoining landowners are asking the state to close it to boating and hunting so it can be a rest area for waterfowl.
El Carmen stretches from Texas into Mexico and is the result of conservation agreements between Cemex and adjoining landowners on both sides of the border.
The street and sidewalk work required LTD to acquire a 10-foot wide strip of land from adjoining landowners and to remove the front of the slope, said district spokesman Edward McGlone.
"As the council has not been able to discover who owns this 'sub soil' under the redundant highway, it will revert back to the adjoining landowners, such as ourselves.
Farmers, adjoining landowners and institutional investors were among the bidders for the two blocks, says James.
Hunters working together with adjoining landowners can manage toward a balanced adult sex ratio or even skew the adult sex ratio slightly toward bucks.
(149) To protect adjacent landowners's due process rights, the House proposed a bill in the 2012 legislative session, which required that "[a]t least forty-five days before beginning any drainage activity, any landowner who intends to conduct such drainage activity on the landowner's property shall notify, by registered or certified mail, all directly affected adjoining landowners and all directly affected third parties holding drainage interests of the intended activity." (150) If the legislature adopts this bill, it would add a new section to Chapter 46A-10A.
1899) (holding use of a gas pump which diminished the production of adjoining landowners unless those landowners also employed a gas pump not actionable), aff'd per curiam, 44 A.
Beyond site considerations, adjoining landowners or utility companies may have certain property rights that require an easement right for access, parking or permission for construction.