Court of Appeal

(redirected from Courts of Appeal)
Also found in: Dictionary.

Court of Appeal

An intermediate federal judicial tribunal of review that is found in thirteen judicial districts, called circuits, in the United States.

A state judicial tribunal that reviews a decision rendered by an inferior tribunal to determine whether it made errors that warrant the reversal of its judgment.

U.S. Courts of Appeals were created by Congress in 1891 and were known until 1948 as U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals. Such courts have appellate jurisdiction over the majority of cases decided by U.S. District Courts except those cases in which the court has made an Interlocutory order regarding an Injunction; such cases are directly reviewable by the Supreme Court of the United States. Federal courts of appeals are also empowered to review orders of many federal administrative agencies, such as the national labor relations board.

Cases before the court of appeals are usually heard by a panel of three judges, but in some circuit cases, actions involving significant constitutional questions are heard en banc, with all the judges serving on the court present to decide the case by a majority vote. In 1982 Congress enacted the Federal Courts Improvement Act (96 Stat. 25; 28 U.S.C.A. § 1 note) creating the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit which commenced hearing cases on October 1, 1982, and constitutes the thirteenth circuit in the United States. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit provides a national forum for the uniform application and enforcement of law in cases involving similar issues, particularly those involving patent and public contracts law, which in the past were often decided differently from circuit to circuit, necessitating appeal to the Supreme Court for a definitive answer. This court was established from the merger of the Federal Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Although structurally similar to the 12 other courts of appeals, it differs from them in that its intermediate appellate jurisdiction is based upon subject matter, not geography, and it hears appeals from all federal circuits. This topical approach toward adjudication results from the new court assuming appellate jurisdiction from cases formerly brought before the Court of Claims and the Court of Patent Appeals. The court also entertains appeals from the Court of International Trade, the Patent and Trademark Office, the Merit Systems Protection Board, and other agencies.

In some states, the court of appeals is an intermediate appellate tribunal that reviews the decisions of lower courts on appeal. Its decisions are, however, subject to review by the highest appellate tribunal in the state if the unsuccessful party files an appeal and the justices agree to hear the case. When the state court of appeals is the intermediate level of appellate review, it possesses mandatory jurisdiction; litigants have a statutory right to appeal their cases to it.

State courts of appeals are frequently courts of last resort when their decisions are final and are not subject to review by any other state tribunal. When it is the highest appellate court in the state, the court of appeals has discretionary jurisdiction; it selects the decisions it will review. If a case presents questions involving federal statutes or the Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court might accept the case for review of the judgment rendered by the state courts of appeals.

There might be two separate systems of state courts of appeals: one for the review of civil cases and one for the appeal of criminal matters.


Appellate Court; Federal Courts.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Court of Appeal

an English court. It comprises a Civil Division and a Criminal Division and hears most appeals in England. It is a central court, and cases come from all over the country. The Master of the Rolls heads up the Civil Division; the Lord Chief Justice the Criminal Division. Its importance lies in the fact that unless the House of Lords itself grants leave, there is no appeal beyond the Court of Appeal without leave of that court itself In civil cases it receives appeals from the High Court (all divisions) and from the County Court. In criminal cases appeals lie primarily for the Crown Court.
Collins Dictionary of Law © W.J. Stewart, 2006
References in periodicals archive ?
The courts of appeals vary in their willingness to consider belated
As the preceding paragraph suggests, courts of appeals sometimes
To answer this question, we examine the treatment given to policies from Ontario and the other provinces, and to the decisions of the courts of appeal. If the Supreme Court gives greater support to the laws and judges of Ontario, we may conclude that it is reinforcing the dominance of the constitutional center over the periphery.
The courts of appeal for the Prairie and Atlantic provinces did significantly less well on appeal; the Supreme Court affirmed those courts just over half the time (56 percent and 54 percent, respectively).
This decision applies with regards to all eight Courts of Appeal throughout the country.
Before this decision the heads of the Courts of Appeal were appointed on the basis of experience and number of years working in the field, with the approval of the Minister of Justice.
Circuit Courts of Appeals by holding that ERISA's prohibition against the assignment or alienation of pension plan benefits was a restriction on the transfer of a debtor's beneficial interest in a trust that was enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law.
Two of the three Federal courts of appeals reached their conclusion by interpreting the Supreme Court's decision in Perkins as excluding the use of cellmate informants from the definition of interrogation for purposes of Miranda.(22) The case of United States v.
The Second, Eighth and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals have interpreted the amendments more liberally.
Cases originating in the Second, Eighth and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals generally are decided by applying the less restrictive knowledge-of-the-transaction standard.