Hume, David

(redirected from Humean)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Encyclopedia.

Hume, David

David Hume was an eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher, historian, and social theorist who influenced the development of skepticism and empiricism, two schools of philosophical thought. Hume's economic and political ideas influenced Adam Smith, the Scottish economist and theorist of modern capitalism, and James Madison, the American statesman who helped shape the republican form of government through his work on the U.S. Constitution.

Hume was born August 25, 1711, in Chirn-side, near Edinburgh, Scotland. He entered Edinburgh University when he was twelve. He left the university after several years of study and attempted to study law. He did not like the subject, and instead read widely in philosophy. In 1729 he suffered a nervous breakdown. After a prolonged recovery, he moved to France in 1734, where he wrote his first work, A Treatise on Human Nature. The book was not published until 1739 and was largely ignored. His next work, Essays, Moral and Political (1741), attracted favorable notice. Throughout the 1740s Hume's religious skepticism doomed his chances for a professorship at Edinburgh University. He spent the decade as a tutor and then as secretary to a Scottish general. During this period he wrote several more works of philosophy, including An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751).

In 1752 he was made librarian of the Faculty of Advocates Library at Edinburgh. From 1754 to 1762, he published his monumental History of England, which for many years was considered the basic text of English history. This work brought him international fame. He later served as secretary to the British counsel in Paris. He died August 25, 1776, in Edinburgh.

"The Heart OF Man IS MADE TO RECONCILE Contradictions."
—David Hume

As a philosopher, Hume espoused a skeptical viewpoint, distrusting speculation. He believed that all knowledge comes from experience and that the mind contains nothing but a collection of perceptions, that all events are viewed and interpreted through the sensations of the mind. He attacked the principle of causality, which states that nothing can happen or exist without a cause. Hume was willing to admit that one event, or set of sense impressions, always precedes another, but he argued that this did not prove that the first event causes the second. A person can conclude that causality exists, but that conclusion is based on belief, not proof. Therefore, a person cannot expect the future to be similar to the past, because there is no rational basis for that expectation.

Like his philosophical beliefs, Hume's essays on politics and economics were influential in his time. Historians have concluded that James Madison read Hume's Essays, Moral and Political and applied some of the ideas from this work while helping write the Constitution and The Federalist Papers. Hume was concerned about the formation of factions based on religion, politics, and other common interests. He concluded that a democratic society needs to prevent factions, which ultimately undermine the government and lead to violence. Madison agreed that factions can divide government but came to the opposite conclusion: the more factions the better. In Madison's view more factions made it less likely that any one party or coalition of parties would be able to gain control of government and invade the rights of other citizens. The system of checks and balances contained in the Constitution was part of Madison's plan for placing some limits on factions.

Further readings

Allan, James. 1999. "To Exclude or Not to Exclude Improperly Obtained Evidence: Is a Humean Approach More Helpful?" University of Tasmania Law Review 18 (October).

Arkin, Marc M. 1995. "'The Intractable Principle': David Hume, James Madison, Religion, and the Tenth Federalist." American Journal of Legal History 39.

Mossner, Ernest Campbell. 2001. The Life of David Hume. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Schmidt, Claudia M. 2003. David Hume: Reason in History. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.

Vermeule, Adrian. 2003."Hume's Second-Best Constitutionalism." University of Chicago Law Review 70 (winter).


Hobbes, Thomas; Jurisprudence; Locke, John.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Humean Activity: What it is for r to be a normative RKR for A to [phi] is for r to be a reason shared by everyone engaged in a and for r to explain why [phi]-ing promotes some of As desires.
Any such ethics will then in fact be treated as Humean natural law.
In sum, from a Humean point of view, it is biologically indispensable for rational beings to stamp the perceived regularity of accompaniment of like As and Bs with the character of causality qua necessary connection, regardless of the lack of an empirical warrant involved.
Even those constructivists who attempt to combine causal and constitutive theorising, have often based this differentiation on attaching causal theorising to the Humean conception of causation, while associating constitutive theorising with interpretive methods (Kurki, 2008, ch.
The first instance is the most extensive; Cleanthes uses it to attack the (very Humean) distinction between provable common life and distant speculations:
Scott's successful formula of historical romance, founded on the Humean brand of skepticism, posed a great challenge for his "shadow" rivals, James Hogg and John Gait, who chose romance and history, respectively, as alternatives to the Waverley novels.
The Humean need not choose from among the different versions of the evolutionary account of morality; Hume himself took the existence of moral sentiments simply as a kind of given--a feature of the creatures we happen to be.
Here we will consider again the famous Humean problem -which is treated by most Hume scholars -respecting the returning of money to a seditious bigot as the indicator of the conflict of impartiality.
Upon reading "The Sceptic," and McCarthy's characterization of the Humean "sceptic," one can hardly think of a more accurate description of the kind of moral philosophy some thinkers have found in the legacy of Ludwig Wittgenstein.
However, the suggestion of the title that the collection is primarily focused on Lewis's doctrine of Humean supervenience is somewhat misleading.
Modern philosophy has variously identified "substance" as Descartes's self-enclosed thinker, Locke's inert, unknowable substratum, or the chimera of a Humean distinct and separable impression.