Hume, David

(redirected from Humeans)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Encyclopedia.
Related to Humeans: humans, human, David Hume, Thomas Aquinas

Hume, David

David Hume was an eighteenth-century Scottish philosopher, historian, and social theorist who influenced the development of skepticism and empiricism, two schools of philosophical thought. Hume's economic and political ideas influenced Adam Smith, the Scottish economist and theorist of modern capitalism, and James Madison, the American statesman who helped shape the republican form of government through his work on the U.S. Constitution.

Hume was born August 25, 1711, in Chirn-side, near Edinburgh, Scotland. He entered Edinburgh University when he was twelve. He left the university after several years of study and attempted to study law. He did not like the subject, and instead read widely in philosophy. In 1729 he suffered a nervous breakdown. After a prolonged recovery, he moved to France in 1734, where he wrote his first work, A Treatise on Human Nature. The book was not published until 1739 and was largely ignored. His next work, Essays, Moral and Political (1741), attracted favorable notice. Throughout the 1740s Hume's religious skepticism doomed his chances for a professorship at Edinburgh University. He spent the decade as a tutor and then as secretary to a Scottish general. During this period he wrote several more works of philosophy, including An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751).

In 1752 he was made librarian of the Faculty of Advocates Library at Edinburgh. From 1754 to 1762, he published his monumental History of England, which for many years was considered the basic text of English history. This work brought him international fame. He later served as secretary to the British counsel in Paris. He died August 25, 1776, in Edinburgh.

"The Heart OF Man IS MADE TO RECONCILE Contradictions."
—David Hume

As a philosopher, Hume espoused a skeptical viewpoint, distrusting speculation. He believed that all knowledge comes from experience and that the mind contains nothing but a collection of perceptions, that all events are viewed and interpreted through the sensations of the mind. He attacked the principle of causality, which states that nothing can happen or exist without a cause. Hume was willing to admit that one event, or set of sense impressions, always precedes another, but he argued that this did not prove that the first event causes the second. A person can conclude that causality exists, but that conclusion is based on belief, not proof. Therefore, a person cannot expect the future to be similar to the past, because there is no rational basis for that expectation.

Like his philosophical beliefs, Hume's essays on politics and economics were influential in his time. Historians have concluded that James Madison read Hume's Essays, Moral and Political and applied some of the ideas from this work while helping write the Constitution and The Federalist Papers. Hume was concerned about the formation of factions based on religion, politics, and other common interests. He concluded that a democratic society needs to prevent factions, which ultimately undermine the government and lead to violence. Madison agreed that factions can divide government but came to the opposite conclusion: the more factions the better. In Madison's view more factions made it less likely that any one party or coalition of parties would be able to gain control of government and invade the rights of other citizens. The system of checks and balances contained in the Constitution was part of Madison's plan for placing some limits on factions.

Further readings

Allan, James. 1999. "To Exclude or Not to Exclude Improperly Obtained Evidence: Is a Humean Approach More Helpful?" University of Tasmania Law Review 18 (October).

Arkin, Marc M. 1995. "'The Intractable Principle': David Hume, James Madison, Religion, and the Tenth Federalist." American Journal of Legal History 39.

Mossner, Ernest Campbell. 2001. The Life of David Hume. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Schmidt, Claudia M. 2003. David Hume: Reason in History. University Park: Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.

Vermeule, Adrian. 2003."Hume's Second-Best Constitutionalism." University of Chicago Law Review 70 (winter).


Hobbes, Thomas; Jurisprudence; Locke, John.

References in periodicals archive ?
Lewis has himself recognized the importance for his position of an analysis of chance in terms of Humean supervenience, and has conceded that it is the potential Achilles' heel of his project where, if he is beaten, 'the entire campaign goes kaput'.
Were either of these theses true, it would be bad news for the otherwise attractive Humean view that a full, rationalizing, explanation of an agent's intentional actions always can be had without appealing to anything other than beliefs and desires, since intentions can clearly be an essential part of a rationalizing explanation of an agent's actions.
As we have noted, the Humean needs only the weak thesis that constancy is rationally permissible.
Humeans can certainly say things in response to this argument.
The project for the Humean is to defend this claim by providing an analysis of all other facts in terms of this Humean basis.
What Humeans have observed is that if all deliberative reasons can be used as explanatory reasons, then any limitation on the range of elements that can be included in the latter set operates simultaneously as a limitation on the former.
Therefore it is always rational to reject testimony in favor of miracles, or so contemporary Humeans tell us.
Humeans avoid conflict in these two commitments by invoking the idea of direction of fit (Anscombe 2000/1957; Smith 1987 Humberstone 1992).
1) The problem involved an apparent contradiction that arises when one tries to ground the concept of objectively "chancy" events in an ontology guided by Lewis's Humean supervenience (HS) and the associated Best System Analysis (BSA) of laws of nature.
1) A long-time defender of Humean supervenience, Lewis admits that it is a contingent matter--as a philosopher his task is not to argue for the truth of the thesis, but rather to defend its tenability, by countering philosophical arguments against the Humean position, and, more positively, by providing analyses of such apparently non-Humean features of the world as counterfactual dependence, causation, natural law and identity through time, analyses that show how these global features might already be given, in a manner acceptable to the Humean, by the local arrangement of matters of particular fact.
Humeans about motivation hold that desire is necessary for motivation, while Humeans about reasons hold that our reasons for action are grounded in our desires.
Humeans go on to say that no intrinsic desire is required by reason; for any intrinsic desire you pick, it is possible for there to be a rational person who lacks that desire.