Judicial Notice

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.

Judicial Notice

A doctrine of evidence applied by a court that allows the court to recognize and accept the existence of a particular fact commonly known by persons of average intelligence without establishing its existence by admitting evidence in a civil or criminal action.

When a court takes judicial notice of a certain fact, it obviates the need for parties to prove the fact in court. Ordinarily, facts that relate to a case must be presented to the judge or jury through testimony or tangible evidence. However, if each fact in a case had to be proved through such presentation, the simplest case would take weeks to complete. To avoid burdening the judicial system, all legislatures have approved court rules that allow a court to recognize facts that constitute common knowledge without requiring proof from the parties.

On the federal trial court level, judicial notice is recognized in rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence for U.S. District Courts and Magistrates. Rule 201 provides, in part, that "[a] judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned."

Under rule 201 a trial court must take judicial notice of a well-known fact at the request of one of the parties, if the court is provided with information supporting the fact. A court also has the option to take judicial notice at its discretion, without a request from a party.

Rule 201 further provides that a court may take judicial notice at any time during a proceeding. If a party objects to the taking of judicial notice, the court must give that party an opportunity to be heard on the issue. In a civil jury trial, the court must inform the jury that it must accept the judicially noticed facts in the case as conclusively proved. In a criminal trial by jury, the court must instruct the jury "that it may, but is not required to, accept as conclusive any fact judicially noticed." All states have statutes that are virtually identical to rule 201.

The most common judicially noticed facts include the location of streets, buildings, and geographic areas; periods of time; business customs; historical events; and federal, state, and International Law. Legislatures also maintain statutes that give courts the power to recognize certain facts in specific situations. For example, in Idaho any document affixed with the official seal of the state Public Utilities commission must be judicially noticed by all courts (Idaho Code § 61-209 [1996]). In Hawaii, when a commercial vehicle is cited for violating vehicle equipment regulations, a trial court must take judicial notice of the driver's subordinate position if the driver works for a company that owns the vehicle (Haw. Rev. Stat. § 291-37 [1995]).

The danger of judicial notice is that, if abused, it can deprive the fact finder of the opportunity to decide a contestable fact in a case. In Walker v. Halliburton Services, 654 So. 2d 365 (La. App. 1995), Johnny Walker fell from a tank truck approximately ten feet to a concrete floor. Walker sought Workers' Compensation benefits for his injuries, and his claim was denied by the Office of Workers' Compensation.

At the application hearing, the hearing officer stated that it was her experience that a soft-tissue injury heals in six weeks. She then took judicial notice of the fact that a soft-tissue injury heals in six weeks—preventing Walker from contesting that proposition—and disallowed Walker's claim. On appeal the Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, reversed the decision and ordered the payment of workers' compensation benefits. According to the court, it was a clear error of law for the hearing officer to take judicial notice of such intricate medical knowledge.

judicial notice

n. the authority of a judge to accept as facts certain matters which are of common knowledge from sources which guarantee accuracy or are a matter of official record, without the need for evidence establishing the fact. Examples of matters given judicial notice are public and court records, tides, times of sunset and sunrise, government rain fall and temperature records, known historic events, or the fact that ice melts in the sun. (See: evidence)

References in periodicals archive ?
63) How, then, does this ethical prohibition peacefully co-exist with judicial notice of "adjudicative fact[s]," which the Federal Rules of Evidence say a court may take "on its own" and "at any stage of the proceeding?
Of course, to inform the military judge's decision on the request for judicial notice, counsel should be prepared to provide substantiating documentation to the military judge regarding the issue on which judicial notice is sought.
Judicial notice of a fact takes away the need for the parties to prove that fact in court.
One of the tools that Canadian Courts have increasingly relied upon is taking de facto judicial notice of whether the home country of a claimant is democratic or not.
The trial court took judicial notice of approximately 100 news articles and press releases regarding the scandal and determined that the physicians were not acting within the course and scope of their employment as a matter of law.
Though no less offensive, there is an important difference between courts taking judicial notice of a Wikipedia entry to define phrases like "jungle juice" and a court accepting it as scientifically reliable evidence on which an expert may base an opinion.
The doctrine of judicial notice, which allows a judge to consider a
Even in cases that do not involve congressional findings, the Court will often take judicial notice of factual contentions that were not introduced in the adversarial proceedings in the lower court.
About judicial notice, the Court wrote, "In this case, the majority of the Court of Appeal pushed judicial notice beyond its proper limits.
Thereafter, the respondent-intervenors filed motions that the court take judicial notice and for sanctions.
take judicial notice of disputed jurisdictional facts without submitting