Kant, Immanuel

(redirected from Kant)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Acronyms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to Kant: Hegel, Descartes

Kant, Immanuel

Immanuel Kant.

Immanuel Kant shook the foundations of Western philosophy in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. This author and professor did his most important writing between 1781 and 1790 while working at the University of Königsberg, where he spent most of his life. Kant's philosophical model not only swept aside the ideas of the so-called empiricists and rationalists who came before him, it also had a lasting effect outside of philosophy, especially in the areas of ethics and the law. Today, legal scholars still debate his ideas—and their sometimes startling implications—in relation to contemporary issues.

Kant was born into a lower-middle-class family in East Prussia in 1724. A gifted student, he studied in a Latin school from age eight until age sixteen, when he entered the University of Königsberg to take up theology, natural science, and philosophy. The death of his father forced him to abandon his studies in order to work as a private tutor, and he had to wait several years before returning to complete his education. By that time he was already writing serious books. From what is called Kant's precritical period, these early works are primarily scientific. In recognition of his talents, the university made him a lecturer and eventually a professor. He taught logic and metaphysics.

Twenty years later Kant attacked the reigning schools of thought. In this so-called critical period, he wrote his most famous book, The Critique of Pure Reason (1781). Kant's work examined the relation of experience and perception: he was concerned with how people know what they know, and just as important, the proper uses of the powers of reasoning. He argued that reality can be perceived only to the extent that it complies with the aptitude of the mind that is doing the perceiving. This places one kind of limitation on what can be known. Kant saw another limitation, too: only phenomena—things that can be experienced—are capable of being understood; everything else is unknown. The human senses, therefore, take supreme precedence in determining what is real.

These theories have implications for conventional morality. Kant viewed God, freedom, and immortality as incomprehensible: they can only be contemplated; their existence can never be proved. Nonetheless, he argued, all three of them are important as the basis for morality. Kant believed that reason is insufficient to justify moral behavior. The justification for behaving morally has to come from people's sense of duty, which he called the categorical imperative.

Kant continued to develop his philosophy in subsequent books including Critique of Judgment (1790) and Religion within the Limits of Reasons Alone (1793). The latter enraged the government, resulting in its Censorship and an official order to Kant to write no more books about religion.

"The greatest problem for the human species, the solution of which nature compels him to seek, is that of attaining a civil society which can administer justice universally."
—Immanuel Kant

Philosophers have studied Kant's work for over two centuries, but legal thinkers outside of Europe have only widely treated it in recent years. In the late twentieth century, when many U.S. scholars of law turned to interdisciplinary studies that involved the fields of economics and textual analysis, Kant provided another model for argument. Kant's ideas cover the foundation of law while specifically addressing property, contracts, and criminal punishment. Kant proposed that punishment should be meted out strictly without exception—because of society's duty to seek retribution. "[I]f justice goes," Kant wrote in 1797, "there is no longer any value in men's living on the earth."

Further readings

Fletcher, George P. 1987. "Why Kant." Columbia Law Review 87 (April).

Gillroy, John Martin. 2000. Justice & Nature: Kantian Philosophy, Environmental Policy & the Law. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press.

Goodrich, Peter. 2001. "Barron's Complaint: A Response to "Feminism, Aestheticism and the Limits of Law." Feminist Legal Studies 9 (August): 149–70.

Kant, Immanuel. 1991. "Metaphysical First Principles of the Doctrine of Right." In The Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Mary Gregor. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Tunick, Mark. 1998. Practices and Principles: Approaches to Ethical and Legal Judgment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.

Waldron, Jeremy. 1996. "Kant's Legal Positivism." Harvard Law Review 109 (May).

Wright, R. George. 2002. "Treating Persons as Ends in Themselves; the Legal Implications of a Kantian Principle. University of Richmond Law Review 36, (March): 271–326.


Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich; Jurisprudence.

References in periodicals archive ?
To some degree, this is because intellectualists number among themselves many of the leading Kant scholars writing today.
Indeed, Kant himself is aware of these Humean difficulties, as can be seen in two of his initial attempts at sketching a motivational theory.
Since (1) individuals are under a moral obligation to act autonomously; (2) autonomous action is possible in practice only if an individual's life, health, liberty, and possessions are secured; and (3) the only mechanism through which to realize this security is the austeilende Gerechtigkeit of civil society, Kant concludes that individuals "do wrong in the highest degree" by failing to enter or remain in this condition (Kant 1797, 6:308).
Since individuals are under an obligation to enter civil society, and this condition is not something an individual can enter into alone as it requires mutual recognition, Kant claims that individuals are authorized to use coercion against others who refuse to enter into this condition with them.
Hence it can be assumed that, even if, Kant came in contact with any people from these cultures they belonged to a particular occupation and were not a representative sample of the entire culture (and/or religion).
Later, after the death of his father we see Kant accepting private teaching positions respectively with Pastor Andersch, and a Prussian Knight, von Hulsen and it appears that as a private tutor Kant was well respected and socially accepted by his employers.
Esta conexion es relativamente evidente en casi todos estos usos, como tratare de mostrar, y pienso que se trata de una pieza clave a la hora de evaluar la nocion kantiana de autoconciencia en su conjunto y con todos sus matices, aun cuando Kant no haya explorado sistematica y expresamente dicha conexion.
La estrategia que seguire en este trabajo consistira en determinar los distintos sentidos del concepto de vida en Kant y, especialmente a proposito del ultimo de ellos, el que aqui denomino estetico, investigar su relacion con el problema de la autoconciencia.
Only in response to my essay "Those Obscure Objects of Desire: The Uses and Abuses of Object-Oriented Ontology and Speculative Realism" does Harman come close to acknowledging that Kant beat him to a crucial formulation in object-oriented ontology.
Granted, Kant does warn readers in his second Critique [Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (KpV)] that "respect [.
Chapter 6 discusses the extent to which Kant ties the world to the human standpoint.
En sus Lecciones de metafisica (1762-1764), Kant festeja en Descartes al fisico, al matematico y al autor de un metodo para conocer la verdad (vease Fichant, 2006).