Lesser Included Offense

Also found in: Acronyms, Wikipedia.

Lesser Included Offense

A lesser crime whose elements are encompassed by a greater crime.

A lesser included offense shares some, but not all, of the elements of a greater criminal offense. Therefore, the greater offense cannot be committed without also committing the lesser offense. For example, Manslaughter is a lesser included offense of murder, assault is a lesser included offense of rape, and unlawful entry is a lesser included offense of Burglary.

The rules of Criminal Procedure permit two or more offenses to be charged together, regardless of whether they are misdemeanors or felonies, provided that the crimes are of a similar character and based on the same act or common plan. This permits prosecutors to charge the greater offense and the lesser included offense together. Although the offenses can be charged together, the accused cannot be found guilty of both offenses because they are both parts of the same crime (the lesser offense is part of the greater offense).

When a defendant is charged with a greater offense and one or more lesser included offenses, the trial court is generally required to give the jury instructions as to each of the lesser included offenses as well as the greater offense. However, a defendant may waive his or her right to have the jury so instructed. If the jury finds guilt Beyond a Reasonable Doubt as to a lesser included offense, but finds reasonable doubt as to the defendant's guilt with regard to the greater offense, the court should instruct the jury that it may convict on the lesser charge.

It is not uncommon for a prosecutor and defendant to negotiate an agreement by which the defendant pleads guilty to the lesser included offense either before the trial begins or before the jury returns a verdict. Such a plea negotiation is generally acceptable to the prosecuting attorney because the evidence establishing guilt for the lesser included offense is usually strong. The defendant is generally willing to make such an agreement because the lesser included offense carries a less severe sentence.

The notion of lesser included offenses developed from the common-law doctrine of merger. In the past, felony and misdemeanor trials involved different procedural rights. The merger doctrine determined an individual's procedural rights at trial if the individual was charged with both a felony and a lesser included misdemeanor. In that circumstance the misdemeanor was considered to have merged with the felony, and felony procedural rights applied. The merger doctrine has been repudiated in modern U.S. law because an accused's procedural rights are essentially the same whether the accused is charged with a misdemeanor or a felony.

Further readings

Holten, N. Gary, and Lawson L. Lamar. 1991. The Criminal Courts: Structures, Personnel, and Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Torcia, Charles E., ed. 1993. Wharton's Criminal Law. 15th ed. Vol. 1. New York: Thomson Legal.

——. 1992. Wharton's Criminal Procedure. 13th ed. Vol. 4. New York: Clark Boardman Callaghan.


Criminal Law; Plea Bargaining.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
(26) Under Blockburger, greater and lesser included offenses
This note will argue the South Dakota Supreme Court erred when it held the prosecution's request for a last-minute jury instruction on second-degree murder as a lesser included offense of first-degree murder was permissible.
These cases explained the relationship of Article 134's terminal elements to notice pleading and the determination of lesser included offenses under the "necessarily included" standard of Article 79.
After the close of evidence, Jackson's attorney requested a jury instruction for the lesser included offense of second-degree robbery.
(17) No lesser included offenses were presented to the jury for consideration.
the predicate offenses were lesser included offenses of the CCE
The Supreme Court refused to consider whether the Government's use of a single series of actions to prove both [sections] 846 conspiracy and [sections] 848 CCE violated the Double jeopardy Clause.(59) Instead, a plurality held that by electing to have the offenses tried in separate proceedings, the defendant waived any right he may have had to object to the subsequent prosecution for CCE.(60) justice White concurred with the judgment based upon his conclusion that conspiracy is not a lesser included offense of CCE.(61) Thus, the Court allowed both of Jeffers' convictions to stand.(62)
No lesser included offenses have been identified for this offense.
Second, common law offenses not subject to the per se prohibition relate to murder, lesser included offenses thereof, or offenses premised upon bodily harm.
The state's highest court found that larceny by embezzlement is a "lesser included offense'' of bank embezzlement, and that state prosecutors were not prohibited from bringing larceny by embezzlement charges against a federal credit union employee.
(65) According to several previous South Carolina Supreme Court opinions, "[t]he test for determining if a crime is a lesser included offense is whether the greater of the two offenses includes all the elements of the lesser offense." (66) In the South Carolina Code, third degree CSC is not a lesser offense of first degree CSC because first degree CSC does not require that the victim be mentally defective or that the actor know or have reason to know the victim is mentally defective.
This would include those predicate offenses for which battery is a necessarily lesser included offense. (33) Offenses for which battery is a permissive lesser included offense, (34) however, fall outside the court's reasoning.