(1), which implies (1.1), should be understood as "logical proposition
" ("logische Aussage") but not as "ontological proposition," according to Iwata, whereas the causal relation indicated by "[symbol omitted]" can only be understood on an ontological level.
A fairly logical proposition
! But then why have we not been able to attract investment to take material advantage of the huge coal reserves position?
The logical propositions
in neutrosophic logic are partially true, in the form of (t, i, f), not totally 100% true or (1, 0, 0).
: "The bank of that river consists partly of
I'm afraid you haven't really got hold of my main contention, to which the whole business of logical propositions
is only a corollary.
Propositions like Russell's "axiom of reducibility" are not logical propositions
, and this explains our feeling that if true, they can only be true by a happy chance (Wittgenstein 1922: prop.