References in periodicals archive ?
Insanity Defense: M'Naghten Rules, Crime Library (last visited Jan.
The M'Naghten rules state that a defendant should not be held responsible for his actions only if, due to his mental disease or defect, he did not know that his act would be wrong or did not understand the nature and quality of his actions.
The M'Naghten rules has been criticized because it is only a cognitive standard and does not have a volitional arm.
In the decades before the M'Naghten Rules were formulated in 1843, insanity law was not grounded in precise and technical requirements such as 'disease of the mind'.
The M'Naghten Rules were formulated by I5 judges of the Queen's Bench in response to five questions put to them by the House of Lords when they were called to appear to defend the controversial M'Naghten decision.
8) The infanticide provision required the courts to interpret the relationship between actus reus and a disease of the mind de novo (Walker 1968:131) where the M'Naghten rules would not be satisfied, but without this being adopted as a general principle.
The M'Naghten Rules, with their focus on delusions understood as wrong beliefs, clearly reflected contemporary psychiatric preoccupations, but transformed the psychiatric foci into distinctly legal constructs widely perceived by psychiatrists to be at odds with the fundamentals of psychiatric understanding (see Teubner, 1989:748-9; see also Forshaw and Rollin 1990:75-101).
adopted the M'Naghten rules they were simply codifying what was
delusion" part of the M'Naghten rules, so the integrationist
The statistics cited above suggest that although insanity pleas were ostensibly evaluated according to the objective criteria known as the M'Naghten Rules, the insanity acquittal was gendered, and subjective notions of appropriate male and female behaviour dictated how jurors would respond to insanity pleas.
13) Named for the particularly controversial case which inspired their creation, the M'Naghten Rules stipulated that a defendant was not legally responsible for his crime if at the time he committed the crime he "was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
Although England did not codify the insanity test in the M'Naghten rules until 1843, various cultures have excused mentally ill individuals from criminal responsibility.