summary judgment

(redirected from Moving party)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical.

Summary Judgment

A procedural device used during civil litigation to promptly and expeditiously dispose of a case without a trial. It is used when there is no dispute as to the material facts of the case and a party is entitled to judgment as a Matter of Law.

Any party may move for summary judgment; it is not uncommon for both parties to seek it. A judge may also determine on her own initiative that summary judgment is appropriate. Unlike with pretrial motions to dismiss, information such as affidavits, interrogatories, depositions, and admissions may be considered on a motion for summary judgment. Any evidence that would be admissible at trial under the rules of evidence may support a motion for summary judgment. Usually a court will hold oral arguments on a summary judgment motion, although it may decide the motion on the parties' briefs and supporting documentation alone.

The purpose of summary judgment is to avoid unnecessary trials. It may also simplify a trial, as when partial summary judgment dispenses with certain issues or claims. For example, a court might grant partial summary judgment in a personal injury case on the issue of liability. A trial would still be necessary to determine the amount of damages.

Two criteria must be met before summary judgment may be properly granted: (1) there must be no genuine issues of material fact, and (2) the Movant must be entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A genuine issue implies that certain facts are disputed. Usually a party opposing summary judgment must introduce evidence that contradicts the moving party's version of the facts. Moreover, the facts in dispute must be central to the case; irrelevant or minor factual disputes will not defeat a motion for summary judgment. Finally, the law as applied to the undisputed facts of the case must mandate judgment for the moving party. Summary judgment does not mean that a judge decides which side would prevail at trial, nor does a judge determine the credibility of witnesses. Rather, it is used when no factual questions exist for a judge or jury to decide.

The moving party has the initial burden to show that summary judgment is proper even if the moving party would not have the Burden of Proof at trial. The court generally examines the evidence presented with the motion in the light most favorable to the opposing party. Where the opposing party will bear the burden of proof at trial, the moving party may obtain summary judgment by showing that the opposing party has no evidence or that its evidence is insufficient to meet its burden at trial.

Jurisdictions vary in their requirements for opposing a summary judgment motion. Federal rule of civil procedure 56 governs the applicability of summary judgment in federal proceedings, and each state has its own rules. In some states it is sufficient if the party opposing the motion merely calls the court's attention to inconsistencies in the pleadings and the movant's evidence without introducing further evidence. This approach rarely results in a court's granting summary judgment. On the other hand, other jurisdictions, including federal courts, do not permit a party opposing summary judgment to rest on the pleadings alone. Once the movant has met the initial burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue of material fact, the burden shifts to the opposing party to introduce evidence to contradict the movant's allegations.

summary judgment

n. a court order ruling that no factual issues remain to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action in a complaint can be decided upon certain facts without trial. A summary judgment is based upon a motion by one of the parties that contends that all necessary factual issues are settled, and therefore need not be tried. The motion is supported by declarations under oath, excerpts from depositions which are under oath, admissions of fact, and other discovery, as well as a legal argument (points and authorities), that argue that there are no triable issues of fact and that the settled facts require a summary judgment for the moving party. The opposing party will respond by counter-declarations and legal arguments attempting to show that there are "triable issues of fact." If it is unclear whether there is a triable issue of fact in any cause of action, then summary judgment must be denied as to that cause of action. The theory behind the summary judgment process is cut down on unnecessary litigation by eliminating without trial one or more causes of action in the complaint. The pleading procedures are extremely technical and complicated, and are particularly dangerous to the party against whom the motion is made. (See: summary adjudication of issues, cause of action)

summary judgment

a judgment in a SUMMARY CAUSE.
References in periodicals archive ?
98) In its analysis, the SJC noted that although the purpose of a preliminary injunction is to protect the moving party from losses sustained that cannot be appropriately remedied after a full hearing on the merits, it must be balanced against the same harm that might come to the enjoined party.
Moving Party currently lives at the following address: {street address} --{city state, and zip code} --
A reply by the moving party is due 14 days after the response is served.
4) Summary judgment is appropriate only if the evidence submitted by the parties or otherwise on file with the court establishes that there is no such triable issue and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
The appellate court ruled that the moving party should be liable for all damages if the preliminary injunction was later found to be wrongfully issued, in an effort to prevent "spurious, vindictive, or spiteful litigation.
A conga line is more like a moving party than a dance.
52) Furthermore, even if it could be shown that the juror was dishonest, McDonough's second requirement places the additional burden on the moving party to "then further show that a correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause.
will grant a request for provisional measures only where the moving party has demonstrated that the Court has substantive jurisdiction, the party will suffer irreparable prejudice if not protected, and there is a certain amount of urgency surrounding the moving party's claim.
In order to prevail on summary judgment, the moving party must show absence of material issue of fact and a right to prevail as a matter of law.
wrongfully suffered by the moving party and the irreparable benefit
The court explained that in a motion for summary judgment, the movant must prove that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party must prevail as a matter of law.
The ultra-right British National Party were quick to try to cash in on the situation, moving party members into the area.