Multidistrict Litigation

Multidistrict Litigation

A procedure provided by federal statute (28 U.S.C.A. § 1407) that permits civil lawsuits with at least one common (and often intricate) Question of Fact that have been pending in different federal district courts to be transferred and consolidated for pretrial proceedings before one judge.

Congress has given the federal judicial system a mechanism to help manage complex and protracted civil lawsuits that are related to each other. Under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1407, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has the authority to transfer related cases to one federal judge for "coordinated and consolidated pre-trial discovery" in advance of trial. The panel is composed of seven federal judges based throughout the United States, who have been appointed by the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. The panel's clerk's office is located in Washington, D.C.

Certain types of litigation are good candidates for transfer and consolidation to a single judge. torts involving a disaster (usually airplane crashes), Product Liability, trademark and patent infringement, Securities violations, and antitrust issues have typically used multidistrict transfer.

Section 1407 transfers are initiated either by motion of a party or by the panel itself. The panel's decision whether to make a transfer is guided by a number of criteria: the existence of one or more common questions of fact within the group of cases being considered; whether transfer would be "for the convenience of parties and witnesses [and would] promote the just and efficient conduct of such actions" (section 1407(a)); the residence of the principal witnesses; the locations where the actions were initially filed; and the likelihood that transfer will avoid conflicting rulings. In general, economy and convenience become the determining factors.

Once the panel decides that a transfer is appropriate, it must select the appropriate judicial district to handle the litigation. There are no statutory guidelines governing the assignment of the consolidated case, but the panel considers the location of the judicial district in relation to the residences of the parties, the scene of the disaster (if the case involves such a situation), the business headquarters of the parties, the location with the highest concentration of relevant documents, and how easily the location of a judicial district can be reached. Apart from these factors, the panel seeks to place transferred cases in courts that have the time to oversee the complexities of the litigation.

After a district is chosen and a federal district judge is selected to manage the group of cases, the judge exercises full judicial powers over the case. The judge will enter a "practice and procedure order" that governs all matters leading to trial. During the pretrial stage, the parties use the discovery process to find out as much as they can about each other's case.

Under the statute, once all pretrial proceedings have been concluded, the judge remands the case to the panel, along with a recommendation as to how the panel should proceed in setting the cases for trial. Though the statute implies that the cases be remanded to their districts of inception for trial, the panel usually transfers a case back to the judge who handled the pretrial proceedings.

Federal multidistrict litigation is governed by the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and the Manual for Complex Litigation. The panel's In re Concrete Pipe, 302 F. Supp. 244 (J.P.M.L. 1969), contains many additional factors that it may consider in deciding whether to transfer a case.

At the state level, similar transfer and consolidation methods have been employed to deal with complex litigation. States have appointed judges to oversee product liability cases involving products such as asbestos, breast implants, and tobacco.

Further readings

Whitman, M. Hamilton, and Diane Festino Schmitt. 1996. "Multidistrict Litigation: A Primer on Practice before the Panel." The Business Line—Newsletter of Ober and Kaler. Available online at <> (acccessed November 10, 2003).


Civil Procedure; Federal Courts.

References in periodicals archive ?
District Judge Eldon Fallon marks a significant milestone in multidistrict litigation, or MDL, filed by thousands of individuals who have suffered serious medical complications after taking Xarelto.
Baig said the multidistrict litigation is moving quickly and lots of jurisdictions are watching it closely as they prepare to file suit.
This case involves a consolidated trial of four cases that are each part of a multidistrict litigation encompassing over 25,000 cases.
Following a Motion to Transfer to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the parties in the various cases conferred and agreed to consolidate the cases in the Western District of Missouri.
Lieberman, whose first job after law school was as an associate at Crowell & Moring, was recognized for his role in complex health care litigation, including the ongoing defense of eight Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in a massive multidistrict litigation antitrust case.
Mitchell is one of more than 4,000 plaintiffs who have sued the company in the federal multidistrict litigation, In re: Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability Litigation, case number 1:14-cv-01748, before Judge Matthew Kennelly in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
He has been lead attorney for high-profile class action and multidistrict litigation matters in various industries.
Toyota, Subaru, Mazda and BMW agreed to pay $553 million to settle consumer claims over recalled Takata air bags in multidistrict litigation consolidated in Miami federal court, plaintiffs counsel announced Thursday.
Summary: Toyota, Subaru, Mazda and BMW agreed to pay $553 million to settle consumer claims over recalled Takata air bags in multidistrict litigation consolidated in Miami .
Plaintiffs lawyers have moved to coordinate most of the suits into multidistrict litigation in Los Angeles, near the company's Santa Monica, California, headquarters.
The authors have organized the main body of their text in nine chapters covering the nature of complex litigation, joinder in a unitary federal forum, multidistrict litigation and multiple lawsuits, and a variety of other related subjects.

Full browser ?