Presumption of Innocence

(redirected from Presumption of guilt)
Also found in: Encyclopedia.

Presumption of Innocence

A principle that requires the government to prove the guilt of a criminal defendant and relieves the defendant of any burden to prove his or her innocence.

The presumption of innocence, an ancient tenet of Criminal Law, is actually a misnomer. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the presumption of the innocence of a criminal defendant is best described as an assumption of innocence that is indulged in the absence of contrary evidence (Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478, 98 S. Ct. 1930, 56 L. Ed. 2d 468 [1978]). It is not considered evidence of the defendant's innocence, and it does not require that a mandatory inference favorable to the defendant be drawn from any facts in evidence.

In practice the presumption of innocence is animated by the requirement that the government prove the charges against the defendant Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. This due process requirement, a fundamental tenet of criminal law, is contained in statutes and judicial opinions. The requirement that a person suspected of a crime be presumed innocent also is mandated in statutes and court opinions. The two principles go together, but they can be separated.

The Supreme Court has ruled that, under some circumstances, a court should issue jury instructions on the presumption of innocence in addition to instructions on the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt (Taylor v. Kentucky). A presumption of innocence instruction may be required if the jury is in danger of convicting the defendant on the basis of extraneous considerations rather than the facts of the case.

The presumption of innocence principle supports the practice of releasing criminal defendants from jail prior to trial. However, the government may detain some criminal defendants without bail through the end of trial. The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that excessive bail shall not be required, but it is widely accepted that governments have the right to detain through trial a defendant of a serious crime who is a flight risk or poses a danger to the public. In such cases the presumption of innocence is largely theoretical.

Aside from the related requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the presumption of innocence is largely symbolic. The reality is that no defendant would face trial unless somebody—the crime victim, the prosecutor, a police officer—believed that the defendant was guilty of a crime. After the government has presented enough evidence to constitute Probable Cause to believe that the defendant has committed a crime, the accused need not be treated as if he or she was innocent of a crime, and the defendant may be jailed with the approval of the court.

Nevertheless, the presumption of innocence is essential to the criminal process. The mere mention of the phrase presumed innocent keeps judges and juries focused on the ultimate issue at hand in a criminal case: whether the prosecution has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the alleged acts. The people of the United States have rejected the alternative to a presumption of innocence—a presumption of guilt—as being inquisitorial and contrary to the principles of a free society.

Cross-references

Criminal Procedure; Inquisitorial System.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

presumption of innocence

n. a fundamental protection for a person accused of a crime, which requires the prosecution to prove its case against the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. This is opposite from the criminal law in many countries, where the accused is considered guilty until he/she proves his/her innocence or the government completely fails to prove its case. (See: presumption, beyond a reasonable doubt)

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Now it comes to Avery's side to overcome the presumption of guilt, which experts say is the more difficult part.
Keep in mind that just about everyone arrested has family and friends also looking for objective journalism in our work, not a presumption of guilt. On the flip side, we cannot give the families of victims any false hope that the suspect will be found guilty because of passionate writing.
The Sindh government has turned the cardinal principle of law 'innocent until proven guilty' to an automatic presumption of guilt if any suspicion is raised.
"Both are neutral acts and neither suspension nor redeployment are misconduct outcomes nor are they a presumption of guilt or a predetermination of the outcome of an investigation.
Varughese also told Malay Mail that another landmark ruling by Malanjum was the Federal Court's April 5, 2019 decision in two drug trafficking cases, where the double presumption of guilt in the Dangerous Drugs Act (DDA) was held to be unconstitutional for violating Articles 5(1) and 8(1) of the Federal Constitution.
By saying that Pakistan's financial crisis is the fault of those who have 'towers in Dubai, properties abroad and Panama-like matters', Justice Iqbal is betraying that he is operating on the presumption of guilt and not innocence, even as investigations proceed against several politicians.
Though Russcol believes that schools should create an environment in which victims feel free to report misconduct and are supported when they do, he also thinks procedures need to be in place to ensure that support for the victim doesn't taint the investigation of a complaint by way of creating a de facto presumption of guilt against the accused.
This is both intuitively appealing and legally problematic: It effectively flips the presumption of innocence to a presumption of guilt.
When the Duterte allied candidates at the national and local levels lose, then the realization that the Filipino people do not want the kind of society President Duterte is pushing for - disrespectful to women, no reverencefor God, presumption of guilt, intolerant of criticism to the point of jailing critics and behavior unworthy of a national leader and a bad example to the youth - will be clear to President Duterte and his "bright" people.
'Using the standard of evident guilt or presumption of guilt this court finds that accused Argosino, Robles and Sombero are not entitled to bail,' the Sandiganbayan said in an Aug.
Possession might be nine-tenths of the law when it comes to proving ownership, but it takes a little more to prove larceny.<br />Under the doctrine of recent possession, merely possessing stolen property or admitting to having stolen goods isn't enough to raise a presumption of guilt. Prosecutors must show that a defendant possessed stolen property "subject to his control and disposition to the exclusion of others," according to state law.