Durham Rule

(redirected from Product Test)
Also found in: Medical.

Durham Rule

A principle of Criminal Law used to determine the validity of the Insanity Defense asserted by an accused, that he or she was insane at the time of committing a crime and therefore should not be held legally responsible for the action.

The Durham rule was created in 1954 by Judge David L. Bazelon, of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862. The rule, as stated in the court's decision, held that "an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease." It required a jury's determination that the accused was suffering from a mental disease and that there was a causal relationship between the disease and the act. Because of difficulties in its implementation, the Durham rule was rejected by the same court in the 1972 case United States v. Brawner, 471 F.2d 969 (en banc).

The Durham rule replaced a nineteenth-century test of criminal responsibility called the M'Naghten Rule. The M'Naghten rule, or "right-wrong" test, required the acquittal of defendants who could not distinguish right from wrong. This rule was supplemented by the "irresistible impulse" test, added in the District of Columbia in 1929, which allowed a jury to inquire as to whether the accused suffered from a "diseased mental condition" that did not allow him or her to resist an "insane impulse."

By the mid-twentieth century, these early legal tests of insanity came under increasing criticism. Critics of the M'Naghten rule, for example, charged that it was outdated and did not take into consideration the broad range of mental disorders that had been identified by modern science. Commentators also claimed that these earlier rules did not allow expert witnesses to communicate fully the findings of modern psychology and psychiatry to a jury.

The Durham rule sought to overcome these problems. It attempted to create a simple and open-ended insanity test that would, Judge Bazelon later wrote, "open up the courtroom to all the information and analysis available to the scientific community about the wellsprings of human behavior." Bazelon hoped that the new rule would allow experts to bring to the jury and the public new insights into "the physiological and cultural, as well as individual psychological, factors contributing to criminal behavior." Bazelon intended it to be not a precise test but rather a loose concept comparable to the legal definition of Negligence. Thus, he compared the term fault in the negligence context to the term responsibility in the Durham context. The meaning of such terms, he argued, would have to be determined by a jury in light of the facts relevant to each case.

Implementation of the Durham rule ran into serious difficulties. The rule did not elicit the detailed courtroom discussion of mental illness and criminal behavior that Judge Bazelon and others had hoped for. Instead, just as expert witnesses had before been asked the yes-or-no question, "Was the accused capable of distinguishing right from wrong?" experts were now asked the simple yes-or-no question, "Was the accused's act a product of mental disease or defect?" The Durham rule, therefore, perpetuated the dominant role of Expert Testimony in determining criminal responsibility, a task that many critics felt was best left to a jury.As a result of such difficulties, the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously rejected the Durham rule in the 1972 Brawner case. The court replaced it with a standard developed by the American Law Institute: "A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law" (Model Penal Code § 4.01[1]).

This new test has been described as a more subtle and less restrictive version of the pre-Durham right-wrong and Irresistible Impulse tests. In coming to its conclusion, however, the court in Brawner emphasized that no particular formulation of words provides an easy solution to the difficult problems involved in assessing the sanity of a person accused of committing a criminal act. Instead, the court asserted that criminal responsibility in such trials is best assessed by a properly informed jury that is not overly dominated by expert testimony. To help juries make such assessments, the court required experts to explain the underlying reasons for their opinions rather than giving yes-or-no answers to simplistic questions.

References in periodicals archive ?
The new services include strategy formulation (creation of a product test automation strategy, encompassing planning, tool selection, technical approach and ROI statement); assessment (review of a client's existing test processes and ROI-based automation recommendations); and implementation (along with integration into existing product development processes).
My point is that this has not yet been done, and until this occurs it will be difficult to defend the |proposed~ product test as a 'performance' test," says Stanley A.
com), the industry's leading multi-vendor service (MVS) provider of instrument calibration and repair, announced that it has added a new Vibration Test System and Hastest Sand and Dust Chamber to their Wayne, NJ Product Test Laboratory.
Electronics Manufacturers Find Partnering for Product Test Overcomes Cost, Time and Quality Pressures
The availability of product test facilities offering marine AIS test services has been severely limited, which extends product development lifecycles and delays the emergence of new and improved products to the AIS market.
99 or higher correlation coefficient) with product test results.
The product test lauded PBXtra's branch office and telecommuter support, and its integration with Outlook: "We should also mention you can `link up' with other PBXtra boxes in other branch locations for a seamless 4-digit dialing plan.
com), a developer of enterprise-class network acceleration appliances, today announced the results of a product test review performed by Miercom, a private network consultancy group specializing in the testing and analysis of networking products.
2] testing hall, which has a ceiling height up to 12 m and is equipped with various laboratories with state-of-the-art equipment for product tests that focus on electrical safety, durability and fitness for use.
A full service online custom market research company providing everything from concept tests to conjoint analysis, StartSampling specializes in In-Home Product Tests, Recognition Based Ad testing and Innate Behavioral Preference based consumer segmentation.
The general principles section deals with issues involved in the planning, design and execution of international consumer product tests across cultures and countries, and the data analysis and interpretation of the results.
The eP Digital Controller is ideal for testing films, adhesives, textiles, polymers and for performing product tests on such things as mechanical and medical devices, electronics and springs," commented Richard Gedney, ADMET founder and president.

Full browser ?