Recovered Memory

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to Recovered Memory: Repressed memories

Recovered Memory

The remembrance of traumatic childhood events, usually involving Sexual Abuse, many years after the events occurred.

The heightened awareness of child sexual abuse that developed in the 1980s also brought with it the controversial topic of recovered memory. Some mental health therapists contended that children repress memories of abuse so completely that years later they have no memory of it. These therapists believed that through the use of recovered memory therapy, victims are able to recover the memories of the traumatic events and begin dealing with their psychological effects. Others in the medical community, however, held deep reservations about the idea of repressed memory and the therapy techniques that purported to recover them. These critics argued that without established standards or procedures, a psychotherapist faced the danger of implanting false memories in a patient. By the mid-1990s these fears were justified, as patients won multimillion dollar verdicts against their therapists based on claims that they created false and destructive memories.

During the 1980s many adults who recovered memories of child sexual abuse through therapy sought to hold their abusers accountable in a court of law. However, under Statute of Limitations provisions, the time for a lawsuit had expired. Courts and legislators responded by changing these laws. Typically, these laws provide that the action must be filed within a certain number of years after the plaintiff either reaches the age of majority or knew or had reason to know that sexual abuse caused the injury.

Once the statute of limitations problem was resolved, a number of civil lawsuits were filed alleging sexual abuse that happened many years before. Lawsuits against Catholic priests using recovered memories as evidence resulted in large damage awards in several cases. Criminal charges were also successfully brought against alleged abusers on the basis of recovered memory. Apart from the award of damages, some therapists believe that a trial and a confrontation between the abuser and the abused is essential to restoring the victim's mental health. In the 1980s courts allowed recovered memory testimony into evidence, despite objections by defendants that there was no scientific basis for believing memories could be recovered. In addition, defendants contended that the memories were untrue, implanted in the patient through a mixture of drug therapy and suggestive questioning.

By the early 1990s, there was a backlash against recovered memory and its use in the law. The False Memory Syndrome Foundation was established as a support group by members of families who claimed they had been falsely accused of abuse by their children through recovered memory. Mental health professionals also contested the validity of recovered memory. Some argued that it is never reliable, whereas others believed it is sometimes reliable but only when elicited by a properly trained professional. In 1994 the American Medical Association (AMA) adopted a policy statement that proclaimed that recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse are often unreliable and should not be assumed to be true. The AMA statement concluded that few cases in which adults make accusations of abuse can be proved or disproved using recovered memories because there is no way to distinguish the truth of memories from imagined events. That same year the American Psychiatric Association also expressed misgivings about recovered memory.

In 1994 a California jury awarded $500,000 in a malpractice case brought against two therapists by Gary Ramona, a father who claimed that the therapists had implanted false memories of childhood sexual abuse in his daughter. In 1996 a Minnesota jury awarded David and Lisa Carlson $2.5 million after the longest psychiatric malpractice trial in U.S. history. The Carlsons sued Lisa Carlson's therapist, charging that she used hypnosis, drugs, coercion, and pressure to implant false memories.

By 1995 a number of state courts had issued decisions that attacked the validity of recovered memories and held that these memories were insufficient to sustain a lawsuit unless supported by independent evidence. Statutes of limitations also continued to be a problem for those seeking to file lawsuits. For example, in Dalrymple v. Brown, 549 Pa. 217, 701 A. 2d 164 (1997), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected a sexual assault claim based on recovered memory. The alleged victim stated that the defendant had assaulted her in 1968 and 1969 when she was a young child but she had only recovered the memories of the assaults in 1990. The defendant asked the court to dismiss the case because under Pennsylvania law the statutes of limitations required the victim to sue within two years after her eighteenth birthday.

On appeal the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff's contention that a discovery rule granted her an exemption from the two-year time limit. This rule holds that if the injured party does not originally know an injury, then the limitations period does not begin until the discovery of the injury is reasonably possible. Typical examples of the discovery rule are found in Medical Malpractice cases, where a doctor's error is unknown to the patient until its effects become physically evident. The court held that the discovery rule applies only when the nature of the injury is such that plaintiffs cannot detect it, stating that "it would be absurd to argue that a reasonable person, even assuming for the sake of argument, a reasonable six year old, would repress the memory of a touching so that no amount of diligence would enable that person to know of the injury."

Further readings

Lazo, Joy. 1995. "True or False: Expert Testimony on Repressed Memory." Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 28.

Mason, Mary Ann. 1995. "The Child Sex Abuse Syndrome." Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 1.

Rogers, William. 1995. "Recovered Memory" and Other Assaults Upon the Mysteries of Consciousness: Hypnosis, Psychotherapy, Fraud, and the Mass Media. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland.


Child Abuse; Statute of Limitations.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
These debates about child reporting were subsequently folded into debates about recovered memory more generally from 1994 onward, as reflected in the 1995 Frontline documentaries 'Divided Memories' (Ofra Bikel 1995) which absorbed adult recovered memory debates into the same representational aesthetics described above.
After gathering together a small group of academics who believed that memories of abused were often false and implanted by psychotherapists, the FMSF began a media campaign against what they referred to as recovered memory therapy (Whitfield, 1995).
February 2006: Bowman appeals, attacking his daughter Diane's "recovered memory".
Much of the cognitive psychology research in this area has focused on one part of the recovered memory debate, the conditions in which false memories occur.
The recovered memory controversy will leave the dissociative disorders field permanently more cautious about memory veracity, but with a new wealth of research that will place it in a more scientifically sound position than it was before the controversy.
In a civil lawsuit filed against Bernardin in 1993, Steven Cook, a 34-year-old seminarian, charged--on the basis of "recovered memory "induced through h ypnosis--that Bernardin had sexually abused him 17 years earlier.
I am going to not sell Elizabeth Loftus, that scary woman who all but denies the existence of recovered memory.
Arnold Wesker is consigned to the scrapheap even though Denial, which premiered last year, is probably one of the most powerful and sensible treatments of 'recovered memory syndrome' one is ever likely to see.
Barden's first trial, in 1995, resulted in a substantial verdict against Minneapolis psychiatrist Diane Humenansky, who allegedly implanted memories of sexual abuse in a patient undergoing "recovered memory" therapy.
I must admit I was impressed with Stocks' replies to me and to the seven others who responded in the September 1999 Social Work to his article, "Recovered Memory Therapy: A Dubious Practice Technique" (pp.
The search for Ah Quin's story enables Yong Chen to reflect on the means by which memory is transmitted, in this case through a complex interaction of public and private documents, family memories, and attempts to construct "recovered memory." The interaction between the professional historian Yong Chen and the amateur family historian Tom adds yet another dimension to this process.
provides an analysis of the ways in which the recovered memory of women of the past can energize and inspire women (and men) today, can establish solidarity among them, and can generate liberating action.