Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.


The transfer of a person or thing from one place to another. The transfer of a case from one court to another. In this sense, removal generally refers to a transfer from a court in one jurisdiction to a court in another, whereas a change of venue may be granted simply to move a case to another location within the same jurisdiction.

Normally a plaintiff has the right to choose the court where he or she will commence an action. An important exception to this rule is the defendant's right, in some circumstances, to have a case removed from a state court to a federal court. Federal law explains this right of removal in detail. It is available only when the federal court has jurisdiction, or authority, to hear such a case. The right may be claimed only by a defendant; a plaintiff cannot petition for removal of a case he or she has commenced in state court, even after the defendant asserts a counterclaim against the plaintiff that would justify the exercise of federal jurisdiction.

If a plaintiff has more than one claim against a defendant, and not all of the claims qualify for removal, it is not clear whether the whole case should be sent to the applicable federal court. Sometimes the individual claims that support federal jurisdiction can be severed and heard in federal court individually. This can be done if the removable claims are sufficiently distinct that they can be determined on their own. Otherwise they must be tried together. A federal court has discretion to weigh the circumstances and decide each case on its own facts. The right of the plaintiff to pick the court must be balanced with the right of the defendant to use a federal court when there is federal jurisdiction. The same considerations apply when there are multiple defendants, and some are entitled to removal of the case but others are not. If there are multiple defendants and multiple claims, the reasoning can become rather confusing.

The process of removal raises serious questions concerning Federalism, the relationship of the states and the federal government. The idea of a federal court ousting a state court from a lawsuit already pending in the state is somewhat unsettling. The removal procedure itself emphasizes the potential for conflict. A person who is sued in a state court files a petition in the nearest federal court asking for removal of the action, which has the effect of removing the action to the federal court. A copy of that petition is then filed in the state court. The state court can take no further action whatsoever unless, and until, the federal court remands, or sends, the case back to it. The procedure generally works well because federal judges are careful to recognize the legitimate interests of the states in determining causes that are not necessarily federal in nature.


Federal Question.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.


n. 1) the change of a legal case from one court to another, as from a state court to federal court or vice versa based on a motion by one of the parties stating that the other jurisdiction is more appropriate for the case. 2) taking away the position of a public official for cause, such as dishonesty, incompetence, conviction of a crime, or successful impeachment.

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
[ClickPress, Wed May 01 2019] The expanding database of Market Research Reports Search Engine (MRRSE) has been recently updated by the addition of a new study which is titled as " Tattoo Removal Lasers Market Valuable Growth Prospects and Insights on Future Scenario (2018-2028) ".
The pool removal guide begins with the step by step process of the Northern Virginia pool removal services.The first step discusses draining water from the pool, then drilling holes in the bottom of the pool for added drainage in case of rain.
New Delhi [India], April 20 ( ANI ): In the wake of Opposition Members of Parliament initiating proceedings for the removal of Chief Justice Dipak Misra from office on grounds of proven misbehavior and their decision to submit a notice to this effect to Rajya Sabha Chairman M.Venkaiah Naidu, the general reader needs to be informed as to how the process for removal is effected under Article 124 (for the removal of a Supreme Court judge) and Article 218 (for the removal of a High Court judge) of the Constitution.
The various factors affecting removal efficiencies of chromium, color and chemical oxygen demand such as pH, dose of Fe3O4 and contact time were considered for optimizing the operational conditions.
Foreign body removal from the air way is a challenging task as it requires the presence of a skilled anesthetist and a competent otorhino-laryngologist1, this task becomes even more challenging when it involves a trauma victim with cervical spine fracture, maxillofacial trauma and emergency tracheostomy already performed.
Appeals against removal orders are growing as US-based immigrant advocacy groups attract greater funding from opponents of Mr Trump's policy.
The limestone precipitation method is widely used in the field of water treatment; however, due to the relatively high solubility of gypsum [19], the S[O.sub.4.sup.2-] removal efficiency is low.
Treatments comprised of manual alteration of plant architecture (F1: no fruiting branch removal, F2: removal of first fruiting branch, F3: removal of first and second fruiting branch, F4: removal of all squares from first fruiting branch, F5: removal of all squares from first and second fruiting branch) and nitrogen rates (N1: 175, N2: 225 and N3: 275 kg ha-1).
Moosey, commissioner of public works and parks, said such authorization would enable the city to process current invoices -- money owed to private contractors for use of their equipment as allow for anticipated future snow removal costs to be met.
Amici are concerned that unless the Court uses this case not only to overturn the decision below but also to explain that the lower courts' recognition of a presumption against removal is unfounded, many federal courts will continue to adhere to such a presumption.