Senate Judiciary Committee

Also found in: Acronyms.

Senate Judiciary Committee

The U.S. Senate established the Committee on the Judiciary on December 10, 1816, as one of the original 11 standing committees. It is also one of the most powerful committees in Congress; among its wide range of jurisdictions is investigation of federal judicial nominees and oversight of criminal justice, antitrust, and Intellectual Property legislation. Meeting each year since the Fourteenth Congress, the Judiciary Committee reviews a vast range of legal issues and advises the larger Senate on how to handle them. Just like any other congressional committee, it cannot pass laws or approve presidential nominees on its own, but its recommendations are highly regarded by the larger body.

Historically, initial issues before the Senate Judiciary Committee centered largely on the widespread western expansion and growth of the nation, with corresponding concerns about the role of the federal judiciary and Judicial Administration. Boundary disputes between states were another early concern. The issue of Slavery was perhaps the most controversial, however. The committee was partially responsible for the enactment of the Compromise of 1850, which included the fugitive slave act. Also, after the Civil War, beginning in 1868, the committee shared jurisdiction to oversee federal reconstruction.

The authority to investigate nominees to the federal court system is the most powerful and controversial authority delegated to the committee. Although the U.S. Constitution grants authority to the full Senate to approve judges nominated by the president, the Senate has delegated much of this responsibility to the committee since 1868. When the president submits judicial nominations, the Senate immediately submits them to the committee for consideration. The committee votes whether to approve or disapprove a nomination of a judge, and it votes whether to submit the nomination to the full Senate for its consideration. Both votes require a majority of the members of the committee. If the Senate approves a judge, he or she receives lifetime tenure on the federal bench, barring Impeachment or retirement.

The nomination process of federal judges traditionally has caused a significant amount of controversy regarding the criteria that are used by committee members in determining whether to approve or disapprove a judicial nominee. Some commentators suggest that the nomination process should only involve considerations of ethics and professional competence, while others argue that the real considerations among committee members relate to the ideologies and philosophies of the nominees.

When President ronald reagan nominated robert bork in 1987 to fill a vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court, it was evident from the questioning during the nomination hearing that the senators took numerous factors into account. Bork, who had been a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and known for his conservative views, was selected by the Republican president to replace Justice lewis powell, whose views were more moderate. Both the committee and the full Senate eventually turned down Bork's nomination, based largely on ideology. Public-interest groups supporting or opposing Bork spent a reported $20 million in their attempts to influence the nomination. Similar questions of ideology and philosophy have been raised about the 1991 confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas.

The publicity surrounding the nomination process in the federal judiciary did not begin until the twentieth century. Historically, few nominees appeared before the committee. Several high-profile nominees, including louis brandeis, hugo black, and Felix Frankfurter, offered statements for the committee to consider. It is now common for all nominees to make statements before the committee.

With a high number of nominations to the federal judiciary, it is not uncommon for the committee to send nominations of judges in lower courts to subcommittees. This process continues to be lengthy.

Other areas of jurisdiction of the committee include legislative oversight of Apportionment of representatives; Bankruptcy; mutiny, Espionage, and counterfeiting; civil liberties; constitutional amendments; government information; holidays and celebrations; immigration and naturalization; interstate compacts; local courts in territories and possessions of the United States; national penitentiaries; Patents, copyrights, and Trademarks; protection of trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies; and state and territory boundary lines.

After the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 (See September 11th Attacks), the Judiciary Committee held a number of hearings on the issues of Terrorism and homeland defense. The committee also has taken an active role in such social issues as Civil Rights protection, law enforcement, and reform of the criminal justice system. Controversies in 2001 extended to the cabinet nominees, including the position of attorney general. When President george w. bush nominated then-Senator john ashcroft (R-Mo.) for the position in 2001, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) immediately indicated that he would oppose the confirmation. While Ashcroft was eventually confirmed, he also was required to appear before the committee numerous times throughout 2001 to report on issues involving the Attorney General's Office and the Justice Department.

Further readings

Denning, Brannon P. 2002. "The Judicial Confirmation Process and the Blue Slip." Judicature 85 (March-April).

National Archives and Records Administration. "Records of the Committee on the Judiciary and Related Committees." Available at <> (accessed May 16, 2002).

Nourse, Victoria F, and Jane S. Schacter. 2002. "The Politics of Legislative Drafting: A Congressional Case Study." New York University Law Review 77 (June).

Ralph Nader Congress Project. 1975. The Judiciary Committees: A Study of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. New York: Grossman.

U.S. Senate. "United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary." Available online at <> (accessed June 24, 2002).

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Downing's nomination was reported favorably by voice vote on Thursday in the Senate Judiciary Committee and will now move to the full Senate for consideration.
The Senate Judiciary Committee said it would not accept any testimony on the amendments, while the Assembly Appropriations Committee said it would accept a maximum of three minutes of testimony for any person.
Keyser wrote a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee to say she believed Ford but did not remember the 1982 party in question.
A lawyer for Mark Judge says he "does not recall the events" described by Ford during her dramatic testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Washington DC [USA], Sept 28 ( ANI ): A GoFundMe campaign set up for Christine Ford, the woman who has accused President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, saw a surge in donations as she delivered an emotional testimony in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday.
In light of the new allegations, the Senate Judiciary Committee said it will "attempt to evaluate" the new claims, while slamming the Democrats for deliberately "withholding information" regarding the case.
Last December Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa.) "referred Planned Parenthood and several other abortion providers to the FBI for investigation after a lengthy probe into the transfers of fetal tissue," Solomon explained.
At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in May, Boggs told the senators that he now believes his vote on abortion doctors was wrong and he's glad the Confederate emblem was later removed from the flag.
A bill that was unanimously approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee in November aims to address that problem by requiring the government to obtain a warrant before reading people's email.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has put off its vote on Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor for one week amid objections from the panel's conservative Republicans.
NDAA is working closely with other criminal justice groups to address their concerns to Senator Webb and Senate Judiciary Committee members before the bill passes out of committee.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has already approved SJR10, the Senate version of the resolution, for a vote by the full Senate.

Full browser ?