Spendthrift Trust


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
Related to Spendthrift Trust: Spendthrift clause

Spendthrift Trust

An arrangement whereby one person sets aside property for the benefit of another in which, either because of a direction of the settlor (one who creates a trust) or because of statute, the beneficiary (one who profits from the act of another) is unable to transfer his or her right to future payments of income or capital, and his or her creditors are unable to subject the beneficiary's interest to the payment of his or her debts.

Spendthrift trusts are usually established with the object of providing a fund for the maintenance of another person, known as the spendthrift, while also protecting the trust against the beneficiary's imprudence, extravagance, and inability to manage financial affairs. For example, a settlor establishes a spendthrift trust for his son, a compulsive gambler, who spends money injudiciously with no concern for the future. Under the terms of the $400,000 trust, which is to be administered by the family's lawyer, the son is to receive $15,000 a year. Any words that indicate the settlor's intention to impose a direct restraint on the transferability of the beneficiary's interest can be used to create a spendthrift trust.

Such trusts do not limit the rights of the spendthrift's creditors to the property after it is received by the beneficiary from the trustee (one appointed or required by law to execute a trust). The creditors cannot compel the trustee to pay them directly. This means that any of the spendthrift's creditors can seek to have the money the spendthrift has already received applied to satisfy their claims. A creditor's claims to future payments under the trust, however, are restrained. The spendthrift's creditors cannot reach the $15,000 that he is to be paid in a subsequent year until it is actually paid out to him. If such a person could dispose of his right to receive income from the trust, his incompetence or carelessness might lead him to anticipate his income and transfer to monetary lenders and creditors the right to receive future income as it became due. By restricting the spendthrift so that he can do nothing with the income until it is paid into his hands by the trustee, he is more likely to be protected, at least to some extent, against impoverishment.

A spendthrift trust can continue for the life of the beneficiary or be limited to a period of years.

A settlor cannot create a spendthrift trust for herself. If the settlor attempts to do so, the trust is valid but the spendthrift clause is legally ineffective as to the present and future creditors of the property owner. To allow otherwise would be to provide unscrupulous people with the opportunity to shelter their property before engaging in speculative business enterprises and to mislead creditors into believing that the settlor still owned the property because she appeared to be receiving its income, thereby fraudulently deceiving creditors who might rely on the former financial property of the debtor.

In some states, under the doctrine of "surplus income," creditors can reach any trust income that exceeds what is necessary to support and educate the beneficiary. The court hears evidence as to the amount necessary to support the beneficiary in the manner to which he has been accustomed. Any excess of trust income over the sum will be awarded to the creditor and paid directly to her by the trustee. A few states have enacted statutes fixing the percentage of trust income that is exempt from creditor's claims that have been legally determined in a court action.

Certain classes are permitted to reach the beneficiary's interest in a spendthrift trust on the ground of public policy in many states. These include persons whom the beneficiary is legally bound to support, such as a spouse and children; persons who render necessary personal services to the beneficiary, such as a physician; and persons whose services preserve the beneficiary's interest in the trust. tort claims against the beneficiary as well as claims by a state or the United States, such as for Income Tax, are not subject to spendthrift provisions.

In some states, when a beneficiary and spouse are divorced and the spouse has been awarded Alimony, the trustee of the trust cannot be compelled to pay the full amount of alimony until the court that has jurisdiction over the administration of the trust deems it to be fair.

The majority of states authorize spendthrift trusts; those that do not will void such provisions so that the beneficiary can transfer his or her rights and the creditors can attach the right to future income.

Further readings

Bove, Alexander A., Jr., et al. 2003. Asset Protection Trusts: Onshore and Offshore. Boston: Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education.

Eason, Jason K. 2002. "Developing the Asset Protection Dynamic: A Legacy of Federal Concern." Hofstra Law Review 31 (fall).Fox, Charles D., IV, and Michael J. Huft. 2002. "Asset Protection and Dynasty Trusts." Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal 37 (summer).

Nichols, Bryan. 2003. "'I See the Sword of Damocles Is Hanging Above Your Head!' Domestic Venue Asset Protection Trusts, Credit Due Judgments, and Conflict of Law Disputes." Review of Litigation 22 (spring).

References in periodicals archive ?
Upon Judy's death, the assets remaining in the trust will be held in an asset-protected spendthrift trust for Bob's benefit (an estate tax exempt trust) under the terms of the inter vivos QTIP trust.
But the spendthrift trust rule was invaded prior to the statutory change.
An individual who resides in a state which treats individual retirement accounts as spendthrift trusts has a degree of protection for IRA assets not available to an individual who resides in a state without such a law.
A spendthrift trust in its truest form requires mandatory distributions and provides in the trust instrument that the beneficiaries can neither voluntarily nor involuntarily alienate their interests and that their creditors cannot reach the trust's assets.
A creditor's right to reach a settlor's retained interest in a spendthrift trust, under the reasoning of the Brown case, could be analogized by Florida courts to a charging order imposed against a partner's interest in a partnership.
In general, those provisions would now protect even self-settled spendthrift trusts (traditionally invalid in most American jurisdictions).
The Supreme Court's decision was broadly written and did not distinguish the facts in this case or rely on state law to define spendthrift trusts.
Thus, where the beneficiary of a spendthrift trust is also the settlor of the trust, creditors are allowed to reach the interest of the settlor-beneficiary.
The answer is for the parents to set up a spendthrift trust funded with a second-to-die policy on the parents.
17) A spendthrift trust is a "[t]rust[] in which the interest of a beneficiary cannot be assigned by him or reached by his creditors.
If the trust also contains provisions that prevent creditors from reaching trust assets, the trust is known as a "domestic asset protection trust" (DAPT), "asset protection trust" (APT), or a "self-settled spendthrift trust.
A spendthrift trust protects the assets of the trust from the claims of the beneficiaries' creditors.