Split Decision

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Idioms, Wikipedia.

Split Decision

A decision by an appellate court that is not unanimous.

When the members of an appellate court cannot reach full agreement, a split decision occurs. A split decision is distinct from a unanimous decision in which all the judges join in agreement. In a split decision, the will of the majority of the judges is binding, and one member of the majority delivers the opinion of the court itself. One or more members of the minority can also write a dissent, which is a critical explanation of the minority's reasons for not joining in the majority decision. A court that reaches a split decision is called a divided court. Split decisions cannot occur at the trial level because there only one judge presides. Instead, split decisions occur in state and federal appellate courts, including state supreme courts and the U.S. Supreme Court. Split decisions also occur in regulatory boards, government commissions, and juries (where a split decision can result in a hung or deadlocked jury).

Although split decisions carry the same legal authority as unanimous decisions, they have a problematic place in U.S. Jurisprudence. Most important, they can reflect significant disagreement among the members of a court: for example, the judges may not fully agree on a constitutional question, the application of precedents in case law, or the interpretation of a statute. Occasionally, a split decision indicates sharp divisions over an issue that has not yet been settled in the law. In appealing such a case to a higher court, appellees often note that the lower court has rendered a split decision in order to impress upon the higher court that the decision in question is less than wholly convincing. A split decision may be seen as less stable than a unanimous one, allowing more room for a change in the law as society and the court's composition change.

Split decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court attract special attention, particularly when the vote is 5–4. At such times, and especially in the face of controversial cases that are accompanied by sharply worded dissents, the Court is described as "deeply divided." Not surprisingly, since the Court is the final arbiter of U.S. law, a split decision is often seen as an indication of the justices' divergent legal and political ideologies. Legal scholars and reporters, who traditionally assess the justices' political leanings, frequently pay special attention to split decisions when analyzing the Court's decisions for a given term.

Some commentators have argued that a deeply divided Supreme Court fails in its duty to provide guidance to lower courts and also loses legitimacy in the eyes of the public. Justice Felix Frankfurter feared such a possibility in 1955, when the Court was preparing to consider the question of miscegenation laws which prohibited interracial marriage. Frankfurter urged the Court not to hear the case because he feared that a split decision would plunge the Court into "the vortex of the present disquietude … [and] embarrass the carrying-out of the Court's decree." Nevertheless, unanimous agreement by the Court is not the rule. Many of the twentieth century's most controversial cases have produced split decisions, including the decisions to uphold Affirmative Action (regents of the university of california v. bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 98 S. Ct. 2733, 57 L. Ed. 2d 750 [1978]) and to uphold a woman's right to an Abortion (roe v. wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S. Ct. 705, 35 L. Ed. 2d 147 [1973]).

Further readings

Dickson, Del. 1994. "State Court Defiance and the Limits of Supreme Court Authority: Williams v. Georgia Revisited." Yale Law Journal 103 (April).

Wald, Patricia M. 1995. "The Rhetoric of Results and the Results of Rhetoric: Judicial Writings." University of Chicago Law Review 62 (fall).


Court Opinion.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
New Delhi [India], Nov 18 ( ANI ): Former World Champion Sarita Devi on Sunday crashed out of the ongoing AIBA World Boxing Championship here after going down to her Irish counterpart Kellie Anne Harrington by a split decision from the match officials.
Lightweight Nathaniel Collins won a tighter split call 3-2 over Nauru's Colan Caleb but Sean Lazzerini lost a split decision to home Oz's Clay Waterman.
Kirkdale ABC's Khalid Saleh also reached the 40-42kg final but suffered the heartache of a split decision defeat to Jack McLoughin (Waterside ABC).
The record might always read 'split decision' but I have the belt, so I don't care."
Luc Baskeyfield-Bride had a point to prove, having lost on his debut at the Henry Wharton show in York against a talented opponent by a split decision.
Club-mate Benny Smith in the 46kg (Class A Schools) category overcame Aaron Smith (Pinewood Star ABC) on a split decision.
Fine has issued a statement regarding the US Supreme Court's 5-4 split decision upholding the disparate-impact theory of liability.
The same two members of the monetary policy committee caused the Bank's first split decision on rates since July 2011 when they voted for a rise of 0.25 per cent to 0.75 per cent at the previous month's meeting.
Rees and Buckland meet again after their epic battle in the same venue in February became an early contender for Fight of the Year, with Buckland edging a split decision, and 'The Rock' says victory in the all-Wales clash on home soil will be the perfect way to bow out.
Mayweather is the current WBA and WBC champion having recently beaten Marcus Maidana on a split decision in Las Vegas and Amir Khan is hoping to be his next opponent.
If it's a fight against the undefeated Bradley (31-0-0, 12 KOs), Pacquiao will get a shot in avenging his controversial loss via split decision to the American in June 2012.
Given that Barker beat Geale in August on a split decision in Atlantic City, there was cause for the Englishman and his travelling supporters to be optimistic ahead of the clash with Sturm, but that soon faded.