standard of proof


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Encyclopedia.

standard of proof

in criminal cases this denotes BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT; in civil cases, the BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES.
References in periodicals archive ?
'Police officials are as good witnesses as any other and their evidence is subject to same standard of proof and principles of scrutiny as applicable to any other category of witnesses,' said Justice Qazi Mohammad Amin Ahmed while rejecting an appeal of Qari Mohammad Ishaq Ghazi against a Lahore High Court order.
And there was no support for the youth's arguments that the criminal standard of proof should have been applied to his case.
She further stated that the charge of committing a felony, preferred against her "legally collapsed and rendered unsustainable" after the magistrate court acquitted her other co-accused Ms Luul Ali Tahli, Ms Nasteho Ali Tahli and Ms Zamzam Abdallahi - relatives of the three slain girls - rendering her the lone accused.HIGH COURTShe accused Ms Mochache of failing to critically evaluating prosecution evidences and convicting her on non-existence circumstantial evidence by shifting the burden of proof to her thereby "watering down the legal standard of proof".
The standard of proof shall be whether the Anti-Doping Organization
The second is the standard of proof and could, in principle, be answered in different ways--beyond a reasonable doubt, on a balance of probabilities, whatever.
They said the judge should have applied a criminal rather a civil standard of proof, due to the severity of the allegations, and claimed the evidence of an FBI agent heard during the trial should not have been admitted.
The issue of the standard of proof applicable to the establishment of state responsibility for genocide had been crucial in 2007 when the Court adopted its judgment in the genocide case between Bosnia and Serbia.
Activists want to lower the standard of proof for intellectual disability in death penalty cases.
Almost incredible is that no one has ever formulated an adequate model for applying the standard of proof. What does the law call for?
"Our criminal justice system quite rightly demands a high standard of proof and we acknowledge today's verdict from the jury.
"The answer might be 'yes,' if the standard of proof is merely a preponderance of the evidence," Cahill is quoted as saying, "but 'no' if the standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt."

Full browser ?