Sub Silentio

Also found in: Wikipedia.

Sub Silentio

[Latin, Under silence; without any notice being taken.]

Passing a thing sub silentio may be evidence of consent.

SUB SILENTIO. Under silence, without any notice being taken. Sometimes passing a thing sub silentio is evidence of consent. See Silence.

References in periodicals archive ?
The Missouri Court of Appeals for the Western District reasoned that O 'Grady overruled Frazee sub silentio.
depart from a prior policy sub silentio or simply disregard rules that are still on the books.
Much like the odious Internal Revenue Service inquiries made of Tea Party and conservative nonprofits, this FCC foray into the private domain of editorial selection is meant to intimidate and smacks of Big Brother and a sub silentio return to the Fairness Doctrine.
Buying time for its own sake makes sense in some negotiating contexts, but the sub silentio objective here was to jerry-rig yet another argument to wield against Israel and its fateful decision whether or not to strike Iran.
X, [section] 7 in the Advisory Opinion was in sub silentio conflict with the Florida Supreme Court's prior controlling precedent in Greater Loretta.
In short, the question whether a statute intrudes on the Executive's exclusive, preclusive Article II authority must be confronted directly through careful analysis of Article II--not answered by backdoor use of the political question doctrine, which may sub silentio expand executive power in an indirect, haphazard, and unprincipled manner.
citizens were held as POWs in the United States during World War II after having fought for Germany or Italy, and this practice was uncontroversial, so it seems unlikely that Congress was sub silentio outlawing it in the 1971 Non-Detention Act.
Could it be that he was, sub silentio, lifting up the Christian faith that has undergirded and sustained Western civilization for millennia?
The idea that religious freedom serves autonomy makes sense only if it relies, sub silentio, on something like Joseph Raz's view that "[a]utonomy is valuable only if exercised in pursuit of the good" and that "[t]he ideal of autonomy requires only the availability of morally acceptable options.
5) In effect, the court sub silentio invalidated the regulation, without discussing how it might lie beyond the scope of the IR.
As Scalia wrote, "The Court assumes sub silentio throughout its opinion that Schlaich was not telling the truth.