Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Also found in: Acronyms.

Subject Matter Jurisdiction

The power of a court to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.

For a court to have authority to adjudicate a dispute, it must have jurisdiction over the parties and over the type of legal issues in dispute. The first type of jurisdiction is called Personal Jurisdiction; the other is subject matter jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction will be found if the persons involved in the litigation are present in the state or are legal residents of the state in which the lawsuit has been filed, or if the transaction in question has a substantial connection to the state.Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the nature of the claim or controversy. The subject matter may be a criminal infringement, Medical Malpractice, or the probating of an estate. Subject matter jurisdiction is the power of a court to hear particular types of cases. In state court systems, statutes that create different courts generally set boundaries on their subject matter jurisdiction. One state court or another has subject matter jurisdiction of any controversy that can be heard in courts of that state. Some courts specialize in a particular area of the law, such as probate law, Family Law, or Juvenile Law. A person who seeks custody of a child, for example, must go to a court that has authority in guardianship matters. A Divorce can be granted only in a court designated to hear matrimonial cases. A person charged with a felony cannot be tried in a criminal court authorized to hear only misdemeanor cases.

In addition to the legal issue in dispute, the subject matter jurisdiction of a court may be determined by the monetary value of the dispute—the dollar amount in controversy. Small claims courts, also known as conciliation courts, are limited by state statutes to small amounts of money in controversy, ranging from $1,000 to $5,000 depending upon the state. Therefore, if a plaintiff sues a defendant in Small Claims Court for $50,000, the court will reject the lawsuit because it lacks subject matter jurisdiction based on the amount in controversy. The amount in controversy limitations are designed to regulate the flow of litigation in the various courts of the state, ensuring that complicated disputes over large sums of money will be heard in courts that have the time and resources to hear such cases.

The U.S. Constitution gives jurisdiction over some types of cases to federal courts only. Cases involving Ambassadors and Consuls or public ministers, admiralty and maritime cases, and cases in which the United States is a party must be heard in federal courts. Congress has also created subject matter jurisdiction by statute, mandating that antitrust suits, most Securities lawsuits, Bankruptcy proceedings, and patent and Copyright cases be heard in federal courts.

The Constitution also allows federal district courts to hear cases involving any rights or obligations that arise from the Constitution or other federal law. This is called federal question jurisdiction. Federal courts also have diversity jurisdiction, which gives the courts authority to hear cases involving disputes among citizens of different states. If, however, the amount in controversy is less than $10,000, federal question and diversity jurisdiction will not apply, and the case must be brought in state court. Even if the $10,000 amount is satisfied, a plaintiff may start the lawsuit in state court. A defendant, however, may seek to have the case moved to the federal court in that state by filing a transfer request called a removal action.

A defendant who believes that a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case may raise this issue before the trial court or in an appeal from the judgment. If a defect in subject matter jurisdiction is found, the judgment will usually be rendered void, having no legal force or binding effect.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Plaintiffs' complaint fails to allege sufficient facts and claims to establish subject matter jurisdiction. First, it is well established that the United States and its agencies enjoy sovereign immunity from lawsuits unless Congress has explicitly waived such immunity.
However, rather than divesting the trial court's jurisdiction, the doctrine "informs how civil courts must adjudicate claims involving ecclesiastical questions; it does not deprive those courts of subject matter jurisdiction over such claims."
Mobil argues that Section 1650a provides its own independent grant of subject matter jurisdiction because an ICSID award "shall create a right arising under a treaty of the United States" and provides federal district courts with "exclusive jurisdiction" over such action.
The court first addressed the issue of whether the FTAIA establishes a substantive element of an antitrust claim, or whether the FTAIA is meant to provide subject matter jurisdiction for the courts.
"War crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide fall under the subject matter jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.
Topics include structure and organization of the court system, election of judges and their status, offices of public prosecutor and public defender, subject matter jurisdiction, territorial jurisdiction criteria, resolution of jurisdiction conflicts, and prorogation, delegation, and the ordination of territorial jurisdiction.
(4) Court-martial jurisdiction is dependent upon both personal and subject matter jurisdiction, in addition to a properly constituted court martial.
It cannot legally exceed the powers or the subject matter jurisdiction given to it.
Further, Scroggins went into great detail regarding why the case should be dismissed on the basis of subject matter jurisdiction and argued the case should be handled by state court.
The Joint Committee on Education has subject matter jurisdiction over all matters relating to education through the Grade 12.

Full browser ?