Tax Reform Act of 1986

(redirected from Tax Reform Bill)
Also found in: Financial.

Tax Reform Act of 1986

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 2085, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 47, 1042) made major changes in how income was taxed. The act either altered or eliminated many deductions, changed the tax rates, and eliminated several special calculations that had been permitted on the basis of marriage or fluctuating income. Though the act was the most massive overhaul of the tax system in decades, some of its key provisions were changed in the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 (107 Stat. 416). The 1986 act reduced the number of Income Tax rates to two rates of 15 percent and 28 percent for most taxpayers, although a third rate of 33 percent was imposed on income within a certain upper-middle income bracket. Congress and the administration of President ronald reagan believed a policy of low rates on a broad tax base would stimulate the economy and end an era of complex tax laws and regulations that mainly benefited those who knew how to manipulate the system.

The 1986 act also sought to eliminate special incentives that made tax shelters attractive and the tax law more complicated. Income derived from real estate became distinguishable on the basis of whether it was "active" or "passive." Passive income is income derived from a situation in which the taxpayer does not have an active management role, but it does not include capital gains on stocks, interest income on bonds, or interest on money market accounts. Before 1986 wealthy individuals could use passive income losses from a real estate tax shelter to offset active income. The 1986 act limited the deduction of passive losses to the amount of passive income but allowed taxpayers to carry forward any excess passive losses to the next year.

The act also eliminated the deductibility of nonmortgage consumer interest payments such as interest on credit card balances, automobile loans, and life insurance loans. It also established the floor for miscellaneous expenses at two percent of adjusted gross income for taxpayers who itemized deductions.

Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) once allowed a taxpayer to invest before-tax dollars and enjoy tax-free compounding of interest. The 1986 statute ended full deductibility of IRAs for single employees covered by qualified retirement plans and earning more than $35,000 annually. For married employees the cutoff for full deductibility was set at $50,000. In addition, the law imposed a penalty on withdrawals of IRA contributions before the age of fifty-nine and a half years.

Another retirement plan, the Keogh Plan, permitted under section 401(k), once allowed a taxpayer to invest up to $30,000 a year without paying taxes on this income. The ceiling dropped to $7,000 in 1987.

The act also eliminated a provision that had enabled two-income married couples to reduce their taxes. A couple can no longer take a deduction based on the lower salary of the two; the deduction had allowed them to pay the same tax on the lower salary as a single person would pay on that amount. The act also abolished "income averaging." Formerly, individuals whose incomes varied considerably from year to year could average their income over several years, a calculation that resulted in lower taxes owed in the years of highest income.

The ballooning Federal Budget deficits of the late 1980s and early 1990s led Congress to make changes in the 1986 act. The 1993 Revenue Reconciliation Act revamped the rate structure, imposing rates of 15, 28, 31, 36, and 39.6 percent. The act also limited itemized deductions for upper-income taxpayers and removed the limit on earned income subject to Medicare tax. The 1993 act also established tax incentives for selected groups and reduced the amount that can be deducted for moving expenses and meals and entertainment.



References in periodicals archive ?
7M charge to adjust value of our NOLs as a result of income tax changes enacted by the 2018 tax reform bill and the new 21% corporate income tax rate.
How much is the tax reform bill that was put in place, how much of that is affecting your desire or your likelihood of raising rates over this year?
New York: The passage of a tax reform bill by the United States Senate last weekend puts an end to any lingering uncertainty about the achievability of tax reform and points to a joint tax cut bill passing Congress before the end of the year, says Fitch Ratings.
You would like to think after knowing several months beforehand that the 2018 tax reform bill, that was recently passed, that our local, state, county and federal governments would have their act together long before thousands of taxpaying residents began paying their real estate taxes prior to Jan.
Harris Corporation (NYSE:HRS) has announced that, as a result of the passage of the tax reform bill, the company anticipates making an additional contribution to its employee pension fund, increasing its investment in research and development, and providing a one-time stock grant to all of its non-executive employees, the company said.
Net income for the year was negatively affected by a one-time additional expense in the 4th quarter for federal taxes of USD 241,968 required by the new tax reform bill.
Ron Samford, president and CEO of $390-million-asset Metairie Bank, said the recent enactment of President Trumps tax reform bill provided a substantial benefit to the bank, through significantly lower corporate income tax rates.
Based on the DOF's second tax reform bill, the reduction in corporate income tax will take effect only in January 2020, and the reduction will depend on the annual losses the government incurs from its tax incentives program.
Unfortunately, the current tax reform bill does little of this.
The company expects its tax rate to be about 27% in 2018 as a result of last month's tax reform bill and said it would make strategic investments, particularly after it completes its $69 billion acquisition of Aetna.
The Department of Finance (DOF) is planning to submit to Congress today the draft of its second tax reform bill focusing on income taxes and tax incentives of corporations.
The Makabayan lawmakers added that since Congress did not follow the procedure required under the law, President Rodrigo Duterte should not have signed the tax reform bill into law.