VIS

(redirected from Voir)
Also found in: Dictionary, Medical, Financial, Acronyms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.

VIS

[Latin, Force or violence.] A term employed in many legal phrases and maxims, such as vis injuriosa, "wrongful force."

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

VIS. A Latin word which signifies force. In law it means any kind of force, violence, or disturbance, relating to a man's person or his property.

A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.
References in periodicals archive ?
"Voir dire is not going to sway potential jurors, but it does let you know any inherent biases they have that won't let them be a fair juror," she said.
(17) Voir notamment Tanudjaja v Canada (AG), 2014 ONCA 852,
(28) For our nonacademic purposes here, I would offer the following three potential categories of miscommunication, which, I believe, may arise whenever a metaphor is employed in voir dire examination.
(6) Voir Herve Roch, L'absence, Montreal, Wilson & Lafleur, 1951 a la p 23; Gaston Behenne, Du postliminium en droit romain et des effets de l'absence sur les biens en droit francais, Paris, F Pichon, 1873 a la p 2; Villequez, supra note 5 aux pp 211-12; Firmin Talandier, Nouveau traite des absens, Paris, Charles Bechet, 1831 a la p 2.
Still, before you walk into a room with 125 venire panelists, make sure you carefully think through the changed dynamics of your voir dire presentation under what will be very different conditions from jury selection in a "garden variety" case.
Et le diplomate de rencherir : [beaucoup moins que]Il y a certes des interets pour d'autres pays de ne jamais nous voir lever la tete.
The purpose of voir dire at both a court-martial and a jury trial is the same: to gain information in order to intelligently exercise challenges and, ultimately, seat a fair and impartial panel.
As the most important mechanism for ensuring a jury's impartiality, voir dire enables the parties to probe potential jurors from the jury pool (also known as a venire) for prejudices and unconscious biases.
The problem with voir dire as currently practiced, however, is that courts rarely understand the psychological underpinnings of self-disclosure interviews and why attorney participation is so critical to effective voir dire.
On January 10, 2005, the Odoms filed a motion to enlarge the time for voir dire.
Dans l'essai qui ouvre ce recueil, Michel Brix montre a cet egard jusqu'a quel point l'opposition entre les concepts traditionnels de neo-classicisme et de romantisme se revele problematique dans les commentaires esthetiques du temps (voir "Esthetique neo-classique et romantisme").