actus reus

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.

Actus Reus

[Latin, Guilty act.] As an element of criminal responsibility, the wrongful act or omission that comprises the physical components of a crime. Criminal statutes generally require proof of both actus reus and mens rea on the part of a defendant in order to establish criminal liability.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

actus reus

see CRIME.
Collins Dictionary of Law © W.J. Stewart, 2006
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
And finally, if a Pope can put an entire community under interdict then how does the required coexistence of mens rea and actus reus feature into spiritual law?
Despite the significance of the actus reus, there is little
The Court concluded that there was a collective mens rea (moral unity ) between all the defendants, and they were guilty by the mere fact that the public official had the intention to commit the actus reus of the crime.
The problem in these cases is that, using offense analysis, the courts (1) combined the actus reus and caused-death elements of homicide offenses into a single physical element (called act) with a singular mental element; and then (2) called that singular mental element either general intent or specific intent, depending on whether or not one intended to kill.
22: "For each actus reus encompassed by Rule 77(A), the Prosecution must establish that the accused acted wilfully and knowingly, that is with specific intent to interfere with the Tribunal's administration of justice.
Aware that the justifications for vicarious liability no longer fit the modern section 10(b) cause of action, courts have used the disaggregation of actus reus from mens rea commonly exhibited in fraud-on-the-market cases as a lever to decouple corporate liability from misconduct that originates from lower level employees.
"You have to have two things in criminal prosecutions; an act, or 'actus reus,' and a mental state, or 'mens rea'," he said.
Part III examines the implications of the actus reus requirement of criminal law for the fantasy defense.
Perincek made a judicial analysis and acknowledges there was an 'actus reus' [objective element of a crime], but reiterated that the events of 1915 cannot be deemed a genocide."
that they involve; the emphasis is on actus reus rather than mens rea.