affirm

(redirected from affirmable)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Encyclopedia.
Related to affirmable: Affirmed

Affirm

To ratify, establish, or reassert. To make a solemn and formal declaration, as a substitute for an oath, that the statements contained in an Affidavit are true or that a witness will tell the truth. In the practice of appellate courts, to declare a judgment, decree, or order valid and to concur in its correctness so that it must stand as rendered in the lower court. As a matter of Pleading, to allege or aver a matter of fact.

A judgment, decree, or order that is not affirmed is either remanded (sent back to the lower court with instructions to correct the irregularities noted in the appellate opinion) or reversed (changed by the appellate court so that the decision of the lower court is overturned).

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

affirm

v. what an appeals court does if it agrees with and confirms a lower court's decision.

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.

affirm

to make an AFFIRMATION.
Collins Dictionary of Law © W.J. Stewart, 2006

TO AFFIRM, practice. 1. To ratify or confirm a former law or judgment, as when the supreme court affirms the judgment of the court of common pleas.
     2. To make an affirmation, or to testify under an affirmation.

A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.
References in periodicals archive ?
The thing in itself would not be directly cognoscible, as would happen in a dogmatic metaphysics, but its causal effect on knowledge would be affirmable. "That by means of which the represented stands apart from the mere form of representation belongs to the thing in itself." (12) In his theory, Reinhold accepted the "existence" of something "external to representation." (13)
Like others before him, Wietrowski thinks real being (that is, transcendental being) is contradictorily opposed to the nonbeing of a chimera,(143) or to beings of reason, which he says are essentially impossible things.(144) At the same time, he believes there is, superior to real being and being of reason, a concept of "supertranscendental being," which is thus somehow common between "transcendental being" and its contradictory "transcendental non-being."(145) Embracing both real being and impossible being, for Wietrowski as for Semery before, this supertranscendental being is coterminous with the concept of an object, of "something," or of the "intelligible," "the thinkable," "the affirmable," and so forth.(146)