antitrust act

Also found in: Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
References in periodicals archive ?
The Court noted that, at a very basic level, the business practices of Southeastern Underwriters were in massive violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
was granted early termination of the Hart-Scott-Rodion Antitrust Act waiting period, the two companies said.
Additionally, the complaint claims the airline is in violation of both the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act, the first of which Korean Air has reportedly admitted guilt to in a deal with the U.
They are the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, the Clayton Act of 1914, and the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936.
Newcastle United sponsor Adidas said the waiting period for the deal under the US Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Act, during which competition authorities can request additional information, had expired.
Just five days before the MTA deadline to submit an RFPs for the development rights to the Hudson Rail Yards, the New York Jets organization filed suit in the United States District court for the Southern District of New York against Cablevision Systems Corporation, the owner of Madison Square Garden and Radio City Music Hall, for engaging in unlawful and anticompetitive actions in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
The Swiss-based cement giant announced in Zurich yesterday that the terms of the deal had satisfied the requirements of America's HartScott-Rodino Antitrust Act.
In this recent federal case, a hospital which allegedly had a monopoly and also had "tying" agreements with health care providers was alleged to be in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act as well as state antitrust laws.
In 1922, in one of its more dubious decisions, the Supreme Court ruled that Major League Baseball games do not constitute interstate commerce, and thus are not subject to the Sherman Antitrust Act, an exemption never extended to any other professional sports league.
The federal government filed suit against Standard Oil in 1906 for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act, and in 1909, the company was found guilty; the Supreme Court affirmed the finding in 1911.
Over the past 15 years, the courts have become much more rigorous about what constitutes a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and Microsoft is at the focal point of that discussion because of its antitrust lawsuit.