Attest

(redirected from attestable)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Financial.

Attest

To solemnly declare verbally or in writing that a particular document or testimony about an event is a true and accurate representation of the facts; to bear witness to. To formally certify by a signature that the signer has been present at the execution of a particular writing so as to rebut any potential challenges to its authenticity.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

attest

v. 1) to confirm (usually in writing) that a document is genuine. 2) to bear witness that someone actually signed a document, such as a will. All states require at least two witnesses (three in Vermont) to attest that a will was signed and declared to be a will (except a will written in one's own handwriting in some states). (See: will, witness, holographic will)

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
[2.sup.B] = Dans l'etude du substrat, il est clair qu'on ne pourrait obtenir les elements d'une phrase si on etudiait trois noms un par un; en effet, on ne retiendrait pas, parce que semantiquement non attestables, certaines pistes de noms semblant insensees sans les 2 autres parties de la phrase.
Are these improvements illusory, wishful thinking--or an attestable trend?
This is attestable largely to the relative stability of the Italian language since the Renaissance, regional dialects notwithstanding.
If we examine such practices as authorial claims: for instance, the claim that certain place names are 'their' place names and therefore 'their' country while it may not be attestable on the basis of sound historical analysis, might also be read as claiming the authority to make such a pronouncement.
In addition, the analysis of the histologic criteria shows that they may present a variable grade of expressivity; in fact, a histologic feature may often be easily attestable, but sometimes it is so subtle that to establish if it is or is not present may not be simple.
In Defending Poetry, David-Antoine Williams is concerned with just such affinities between poetry and politics as they appear in the work of three poets--Joseph Brodsky, Seamus Heaney, and Geoffrey Hill--for whom poetry is neither an aesthete's rarefied pleasure Ca purely aesthetic artefact with no attestable significance beyond the singular moment of enjoyment") nor simply a tool of political power structures ("an artefact of prevailing power systems to be judged mainly on political criteria") (3).