coacting

References in periodicals archive ?
The attenuation function of INF-[gamma] may come from other coacting signaling in Th1 cells [105].
Cohesion may not affect success in coacting sports (such as golf, bowling, and tennis) as much as in highly interdependent sports.
The cohesion-performance outcome relationship in a coacting sport.
Nucci emphasizes that character and the context are mutually constitutive and continuously coacting. Character is captured through its coherence within and across contexts rather than consistency of actions or moral choices.
We give the definition of Hom-Hopf algebra H coacting weakly on Hom-coalgebra C from the left, introduce the notion of Hom-crossed coproduct, and then discuss the necessary and sufficient conditions for [mathematical expression not reproducible] H to be Hom-crossed coproduct (see Theorem 4).
The fastening elements each carry securing means coacting with a contact zone of the hygiene article.
It attempted to verify that team members listed in Dun and Bradstreet constituted a coacting team by contacting 25% of the firms in their sample and asking them how often team members formally met.
Although extensive research has attempted to determine the various factors that affect cohesion in the athletic context, no research has examined the specific coaching strategies a coach uses to develop and promote cohesion among athletes in coacting small group sports.
Instead all elements of this dynamic system (Witherington, 2011) are interpenetrating and coacting on one another.
The few studies (Lenk, 1976; McGrath, 1962; Meyers, 1962) which have analyzed coacting teams, where success is based on individual performance which, when summed, results in total team achievement and an overall score (Bird, 1977), have found that coacting team members exhibit a lower level of cohesion than interacting team members due in part to intragroup rivalry and within team competition (Carron, 1982, 1984; Carron & Chelladurai, 1981; Donnelly, Carron, & Chelladurai, 1978; Gill, 1984).
Members of coacting teams scored significantly higher (F1,50=5.25, p[less than].05; F1,50=6.90, p[less than].01) than interacting teams on AGT [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1 OMITTED] and GIT [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 2 OMITTED] subscales in a losing condition.
Similarly, these results may not be representative of coacting, or individual, sport athletes.