This fact encourages each actor to impress additional parties to add support to their efforts, based on whether they view the balance of the strength of A's claim against the amount of coercion needed to ultimately repel B, or B's claim against the amount of coercion needed to earn A's consent to cross as needed as the course of action necessary to earn the most valued outcome to the party.
26) This does not insulate the side winning the conflict to use indiscriminate levels of coercion in establishing and maintaining their regime, as this coercion is as susceptible to subjective judgment as was the coercion originally in the system, and is subject to an identical analysis.
The future value that the coercive party seeks to receive from the coerced party is the continued obedience to the property regime, and the control exerted to realize this value is any continued coercion used to secure the obedience.
Tragic examples of a property regime obviously enforced by coercion are those of coercive prohibitions on goods and services.
32) This realization of the potential imposition and costs of a system of laws enforced by coercion introduces the language of justice, which is the subjective determination that any net coercion used in a property conflict was necessary as meeting some valued goal, and will be further developed in section IV below.
According to the action theory of property there is yet no problem in this formulation, as there has been no coercion used to enforce a property regime.
The action theory offers at least a standard by which potential conflicts can be resolved in attempting to minimize or eliminate coercion amongst the conflicting actors.
In fact, some libertarian theorists have wrestled with the difference between coercion and aggression, but a measure of net-coercion was not forthcoming.