General Welfare

(redirected from common good)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Wikipedia.

General Welfare

The concern of the government for the health, peace, morality, and safety of its citizens.

Providing for the welfare of the general public is a basic goal of government. The preamble to the U.S. Constitution cites promotion of the general welfare as a primary reason for the creation of the Constitution. Promotion of the general welfare is also a stated purpose in state constitutions and statutes. The concept has sparked controversy only as a result of its inclusion in the body of the U.S. Constitution.

The first clause of Article I, Section 8, reads, "The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States." This clause, called the General Welfare Clause or the Spending Power Clause, does not grant Congress the power to legislate for the general welfare of the country; that is a power reserved to the states through the Tenth Amendment. Rather, it merely allows Congress to spend federal money for the general welfare. The principle underlying this distinction—the limitation of federal power—eventually inspired the only important disagreement over the meaning of the clause.

According to James Madison, the clause authorized Congress to spend money, but only to carry out the powers and duties specifically enumerated in the subsequent clauses of Article I, Section 8, and elsewhere in the Constitution, not to meet the seemingly infinite needs of the general welfare. Alexander Hamilton maintained that the clause granted Congress the power to spend without limitation for the general welfare of the nation. The winner of this debate was not declared for 150 years.

In United States v. Butler, 56 S. Ct. 312, 297 U.S. 1, 80 L. Ed. 477 (1936), the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a federal agricultural spending program because a specific congressional power over agricultural production appeared nowhere in the Constitution. According to the Court in Butler, the spending program invaded a right reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment.

Though the Court decided that Butler was consistent with Madison's philosophy of limited federal government, it adopted Hamilton's interpretation of the General Welfare Clause, which gave Congress broad powers to spend federal money. It also established that determination of the general welfare would be left to the discretion of Congress. In its opinion, the Court warned that to challenge a federal expense on the ground that it did not promote the general welfare would "naturally require a showing that by no reasonable possibility can the challenged legislation fall within the wide range of discretion permitted to the Congress." The Court then obliquely confided,"[H]ow great is the extent of that range … we need hardly remark." "[D]espite the breadth of the legislative discretion," the Court continued, "our duty to hear and to render judgment remains." The Court then rendered the federal agricultural spending program at issue invalid under the Tenth Amendment.

With Butler as precedent, the Supreme Court's interest in determining whether congressional spending promotes the general welfare has withered. In South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203, 107 S. Ct. 2793, 97 L. Ed. 2d 171 (1987), the Court reviewed legislation allowing the secretary of transportation to withhold a percentage of federal highway funds from states that did not raise their legal drinking age to twenty-one. In holding that the statute was a valid use of congressional spending power, the Court in Dole questioned "whether 'general welfare' is a judicially enforceable restriction at all."

Congress appropriates money for a seemingly endless number of national interests, ranging from federal courts, policing, imprisonment, and national security to social programs, environmental protection, and education. No federal court has struck down a spending program on the ground that it failed to promote the general welfare. However, federal spending programs have been struck down on other constitutional grounds.

Further readings

Rosenthal, Albert J. 1987. "Conditional Federal Spending and the Constitution." Stanford Law Review 39.

Cross-references

Congress of the United States; Constitution of the United States; Federal Budget; Federalism.

References in periodicals archive ?
When Tomasky writes about the common good, he means an idea about America that people identify with, that they feel is part of who they are.
Its theory of "conservatism and the common good" seeks to rechannel the mainstream.
Business is not generally known for taking the initiative to put the interest of the common good over its own, which is what makes the Chamber's decision on HB 1309 so remarkable.
Thus, the State must always exercise its political authority within the limits of morality and on behalf of the common good, according to its laws, which citizens are conscience-bound to obey.
he said: "As a group of elgin councillors, we discussed what we were using the Common Good Fund for and whether we could use some of that funding for these areas.
The founding fathers of Pakistan were well educated and able politicians who worked for common good. Unfortunately our transition to freedom has been repeatedly hijacked by the establishment and its hand picked inept politicians that we to have deal with today.
"The nation-state is no longer able to procure the common good of its populations alone.
Should the money for the project not be raised in 18 months an update report will be presented to the Dumfries Common Good sub committee.
All of the common good funds have distributed funds benefiting their communities, except for the Dunblane Common Good Fund, which has not had a single application since it was established.
It would seem unbelievable that the Filipino people, whose very culture is centered in bayanihan, a most beautiful collective, communal spirit, would end up being confused about the common good. Oh, we still have bayanihan in spurts as though our DNA remembers what our conscious mind and present-day habits have forgotten.
Pius himself, in a subsequent encyclical published in 1937, sought to provide some clarity by devoting several paragraphs to an application of social justice, linking it closely with the common good of the society, though this introduced confusions of its own.
A most basic ethical principle contained in the Philippine Constitution of 1987 is the obligation of every Philippine citizen to contribute to the common good, defined as a social or juridical order that enables every individual in society to attain his or her fullest development economically, politically, culturally, socially, morally and spiritually.