corpus delicti

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.

Corpus Delicti

[Latin, The body of the crime.] The foundation or material substance of a crime.

The phrase corpus delicti might be used to mean the physical object upon which the crime was committed, such as a dead body or the charred remains of a house, or it might signify the act itself, that is, the murder or Arson.

The corpus delicti is also used to describe the evidence that proves that a crime has been committed.

corpus delicti

n. (corpus dee-lick-tie) Latin for the substantial fact that a crime has been committed, and in popular crime jargon, the body of the murder victim.

corpus delicti

‘the body of an offence’, the essential facts that constitute the crime. Thus, it is not the corpse in a murder trial although a dead body is one of the facts that constitute the corpus delicti.

CORPUS DELICTI. The body of the offence; the essence of the crime
     2. It is a general rule not to convict unless the corpus delicti can be established, that is, until the dead body has been found. Best on Pres. Sec. 201; 1 Stark. Ev. 575, See 6 C. & P. 176; 2 Hale, P. C. 290. Instances have occurred of a person being convicted of having killed another, who, after the supposed criminal has been put to death for the supposed offence, has made his appearance alive. The wisdom of the rule is apparent; but it has been questioned whether, in extreme cases, it may not be competent to prove the basis of the corpus delicti by presumptive evidence. 3 Benth. Jud. Ev. 234; Wills on Circum. Ev. 105; Best on Pres. Sec. 204. See Death.

Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
It is settled that "[t]he concept of corpus delicti embraces the fact that a crime has been committed by someone .
A second common area of confusion in corpus delicti cases arises when considering the burden of proof.
A cursory review of the case law on corpus delicti burden of proof can be misleading.
T]he term corpus delicti encompasses a dual aspect.
The second requirement regarding corpus delicti is that at the conclusion of all the evidence in a particular case there must be proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the essential elements of the corpus delicti.
Some published opinions have held that "Florida law requires that the corpus delicti be established independently of any confession before the confession is admitted into evidence.
of the corpus delicti requirement embodied in the "essential
And finally, some vestige of the corpus delicti rule in the
In a larceny case, the corpus delicti is obviously the spoils
considering that the absence of a corpus delicti as a factor in his
there was arguably corpus delicti evidence embodied in the testimony of
tangible corpus delicti, "the corroborative evidence must implicate