disseize

(redirected from disseized)
Also found in: Dictionary.
References in periodicals archive ?
This clause is found in Article 12, and states: "[t]hat no freeman ought to be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, or deprived of his life, liberty or property, but by the law of the land." (31)
North Carolina, 1776 Declaration of Rights, Article 12: "That no freeman ought to be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, or deprived of his life, liberty or property, but by the law of the land" (emphasis added).
404, 422 (1898) ("By the Magna Charta it is declared that no citizen shall be disseized of his freehold or be condemned but by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
Article III of the same Petition incorporated the provision of the Magna Carta quoted above, stating: "And whereas also by the statute called 'The Great Charter of the Liberties of England, [the Magna Carta] it is declared and enacted, that no freeman may be taken or imprisoned or be disseized of his freehold or liberties, or his free customs, or be outlawed or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, but by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land." See The Petition of Right, 1628, 3 Car I, c 1, reprinted in Hill & Hart, Liberty Documents, ibid at 67-71.
"While press cards of almost 90 of our friends who were qualified to acquire [press cards] were virtually disseized with the general director [of BYEGM] refusing to sign [their cards] despite the commission's approval, it is a monstrosity to allow the issuance of a life-time permanent press card to the deputy prime minister." Bilgin said.
That no freeman ought to be taken, or imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, or deprived of his life, liberty, or property, but by the judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land.
That no freeman out to be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold liberties or privileges, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, or deprived of his life, liberty, or property, but by the law of the land.
(299) The court explained that "no free man shall be disseized of his freehold, or deprived of his property, but by the judgment of his peers or the law of the land." (300) Further, "every partial or private law which directly proposes to destroy or affect individual rights, or does the same thing by affording remedies leading to similar consequences, is unconstitutional and void." (301) Because the law applied only to a small amount of land granted to reservees under the treaty, the court ruled that the law was unconstitutional and void as a partial law.