fallible

(redirected from fallibly)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Wikipedia.
References in periodicals archive ?
King and Queen were absolute monarchs, yet fallibly human.
Yet Tabucchi moves in a similar direction: by keeping enough cards in hand to prevent any particular term congealing into objectivity, he suspends the received opposition between a continuous objective reality and fallibly subjective interpretations of it, echoing the effect of the multiple re-metaphorizations and re-combinations of others' language in both The Infinite Conversation and The Space of Literature.
The document roundly denounced a list of no-noes peculiar (or so Leo was fallibly informed) to the form of the faith that, tested on and adapted to the American frontier, had sprung up in the American Eden.
Avoision occurs within our own consciences, surely not an obvious domain of fallibly drafted over- and underinclusive rules (pp.
However fallibly the case for Barrie's reassessment is made here, it is clear that there is a strong one.
9) It is not that courage requires infallibility or that making a mistake means that one showed no courage; the good judgment required is the capacity, even if it is shown fallibly.
Here, after some initial clarifications, most of the chapter is spent looking for ways to discern and quantify importance, including, practically but fallibly, citation counting.
They know enough to know that glib talk of their elected leaders as a "junta" or an "axis of evil"--or leftover slogans from the 1960s like "war is not the answer"--is incommensurate with the gravity of the problems which the administration, however fallibly, has been trying to address.
He's a manly beast -- in the sense that his reckless personality and actions are fallibly very human.
Though our experience and understanding are inevitably locally interpreted, at the heart of our rationality there nonetheless burns a "universal intent," a passion that turns us heuristically, and of course fallibly, toward the always elusive real.
There certainly is a way to take it seriously but, I think, only by recognizing how fallibly "human" it is.
If one means by objective a characterized state of affairs that will be similarly but not identically reproduced in similar contexts, including the state of knowledge of individuals of their world and of the character of their selves, then the judgments about the correct ways in which to characterize the intensional and extensional features of the world, at least for humans, are such objectively and commonly but fallibly.