Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
IV, II, 5, 42: "[appetitus naturalis] hominis ad beatitudinem hie enim innatus est omnibus hominibus (.
He later renamed this organism Micromyces universalis innatus and regarded it as a micro fungus.
La sinderesis "est quodammodo innatus menti nostrae ex ipso lumine intellectus agentis, sicut et habitus principiorum speculativorum".
disclplinis quibus non innutritus tantum, sed innatus est, sic esse
24) Furthermore, if there were some ground for a charge of having made the Son innatus, it could not be met by citing the word homoousios, for this implies no more than that the Son and Father share a common nature or common attributes, and says nothing about the order of generation.
If it were thought to militate against the orthodox teaching that the Son was generated by the Father, we can understand both the source of the accusation that Origen thought the Son innatus and the manner in which that accusation is treated by our text.
My conjecture would therefore be that the crime ascribed to Origen, that of calling the Son innatus, was not the Sabellian error (b),(31) but either (a) or (c) or a combination.