(redirected from libertarian)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Financial, Acronyms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.


A political philosophy that advocates free will, individual rights, and voluntary cooperation.

The core doctrine of libertarianism begins with the recognition that people have certain natural rights and that deprivation of these rights is immoral. Among these natural rights are the right to personal autonomy and property rights, and the right to the utilization of previously unused resources. These two basic assumptions form the foundation of all libertarian ideals.

Libertarianism can be traced back to ancient China, where philosopher Lao-tzu advocated the recognition of individual liberties. The modern libertarian theory emerged in the sixteenth century through the writings of Etienne de La Boetie (1530–1563), an eminent French theorist. In the seventeenth century, John Locke and a group of British reformers known as the Levellers fashioned the classical basis for libertarianism with well-received philosophies on human nature and economics. Since the days of Locke, libertarianism has attracted pacifists, utopianists, utilitarianists, anarchists, and fascists. This wide array of support demonstrates the accessibility and elasticity of the libertarian promotion of natural rights.

Essential to the notion of natural rights is respect for the natural rights of others. Without a dignified population, voluntary cooperation is impossible. According to the libertarian, the means to achieving a dignified population and voluntary cooperation is inextricably tied to the promotion of natural rights.

Libertarianism holds that people lose their dignity as government gains control of their body and their life. The Abdication of natural rights to government prevents people from living in their own way and working and producing at their own pace. The result is a decrease in self-reliance and independence, which results in a decrease in personal dignity, which in turn depresses society and necessitates more government interference.

Thus, the libertarian views government as both the cause and the effect of societal ills. Government is the cause of crime and prejudice because it robs people of their independence and frustrates initiative and creativity. Then, having created the sources of crime and prejudice by depriving individuals of their natural rights, government attempts to exorcise the evils with more controls over natural rights.

Libertarians believe that government should be limited to the defense of its citizens. Actions such as murder, rape, Robbery, theft, Embezzlement, Fraud, Arson, Kidnapping, Battery, Trespass, and Pollution violate the rights of others, so government control of these actions is legitimate. Libertarians acknowledge human imperfection and the resulting need for some government deterrence and punishment of violence, Nuisance, and harassment. However, government control of human activity should be limited to these functions.

Further readings

Boaz, David. 1997. Libertarianism: A Primer. New York: Free Press.

Otsuka, Michael. 2003. Libertarianism Without Inequality. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.


Anarchism; Independent Parties; Natural Law; Utilitarianism.

References in periodicals archive ?
He sees his base in the tea party and evangelical wings, but he also is trying to siphon off libertarian voters with a message of limited government.
As of today I have changed my party affiliation to the Libertarian Party and I am supporting the Libertarian Party of Nevada and encourage other people to do the same," said Hof, the owner of the world famous Moonlite Bunny Ranch (www.
Root likewise invokes Hand, but libertarian judicial philosophy is not exactly a well-spring of moderation.
Reed has been a prolific writer of libertarian news and commentary at his Libertarian News Examiner and Dallas Libertarian Examiner online columns since 2008.
In the years since Paul became a national figure, these new libertarians have combined with the older conservative base to re-energize the right.
However, that trip to the Curragh yielded little joy as Libertarian was always struggling on a quicker surface, coming off the bridle early on and eventually beating just one horse home.
Following the speech--which was hosted by the Reason Foundation, the nonprofit that publishes this magazine--New York Times science columnist John Tierney interviewed Haidt about his research on political ideologies, his views on morals in politics, and why libertarians aren't easily disgusted.
Brennan considers "the basics" and proceeds with discussions of what freedom is and why it is important, human nature and ethics, government and democracy, civil rights, economic freedom, poverty, contemporary sociopolitical problems, and libertarian involvement in the political process.
A considerable part of Tomasi's difficulty in reaching the libertarian shore is due to semantics.
I see the the term Libertarian generally misapplied in the political sphere, all too often being borrowed by the most obnoxious of extremists.
But libertarian economists cannot fairly be overlooked in an introduction to libertarianism.
Following Rothbard's taxonomy from his 1977 manuscript, Towards a Libertarian Strategy for Social Change, I will present three approaches for a "Libertarian Strategy for Academic Change.

Full browser ?