of right


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Encyclopedia.
See: de jure
References in periodicals archive ?
In response to what their professors were more likely to communicate to them in courses that discussed ethical or moral issues, 56 percent selected "clear and uniform standards of right and wrong by which everyone should be judged." The other 44 percent responded that their professors had more often communicated to them "what is right and wrong depends on differences in individual values and cultural diversity."
Collapse left leg prior to placement of right foot.
Upper body initiates release...(emphasize extension of right leg in driving)
Only gradually, Leeuwen-Turnovcova argues, did a reversal occur in the normative estimation of right and left.
And one of the first genuine juridical declarations of human rights to emerge from this process was England's Petition of Right, issued by Parliament in 1628.
The funding of right,wing ideology has been so successful that it largely determines the political agenda in Washington, shapes many news reports, and has created a significant right,wing following on university campuses.
"(9) This in turn makes it possible for citizens to appeal to an objective standard of right and wrong, beyond the present laws of the present government.
Consequently, the news report written up for Canadian Catholic weeklies carried such headlines as "Ruling described as significant step forward for religious freedom in Canada." It quoted Janet Epp Buckingham, another member of the defence team and general counsel for the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, as saying, "It is the first time this kind of right of freedom of conscience or religion has been recognized for business owners under human fights codes.
It lacked, in other words, what we now know of as the Bill of Rights, the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution.
In fact, it will come with the denial of rights to all those who cannot defend themselves."
The other strategy is a constitutionally dubious maneuver called "court stripping." Many legal scholars say Congress does not have the power to limit core freedoms in the Bill of Rights in this manner, pointing out that it would destroy the concept of "checks and balances" embedded in the Constitution.
Connecticut (1965), the Court held Connecticut's ban on the use of contraceptives to be a violation of the "zones of privacy" carved out by the specific guarantees of the Bill of Rights. Then, in Roe v.