opprobrious


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus.
References in periodicals archive ?
Incidentally, I used to track the origin of these opprobrious names to India.
Moreover, the ECHR also has sustained mandatory civility norms that prohibit the public use of insulting or opprobrious language because these rules advance privacy interests rooted in Article 8(1).
s infamously opprobrious National Lampoon gazetteer from 1976 about Australia: "The local dialect has over 400 words for 'vomit
73) The deleted term was sufficiently opprobrious that, as Sheldon observes, (74) the editor of the Morning Post declined to print it in 1786 (Thomas Sheridan did not die until 1788).
He asked her if she remembered being at Warren Station when a gentleman called her by an opprobrious name for talking to Germans.
24) Athena's virginity and martial interests contribute to her positive androgyny; the Watchman describes Clytemnestra's "man-counseling heart" (n) as an opprobrious phenomenon.
33) This Note argues this standard provides a strong framework for analyzing when employees' otherwise protected concerted activity on social media should lose its protection because the speech is impermissibly opprobrious, and argues that with certain modifications, this standard should be adopted by the NLRB and subsequently by courts.
Considering the racial slur nigger, for instance, Easton (2007) has explained in A Treatise on the iintellectual Character and Civil and Political Condition of the Cohred People of the United States; and the Prejudice Exercised Towards Them that this slur was understood as "an opprobrious term, employed to impose contempt upon blacks as an inferior race" (p.
2) Yet, while James was right to suggest that labelling the killing of political leaders as "assassinations" made them particularly opprobrious, he erred in suggesting that this had long been the case.
14, 2012) (explaining conduct not opprobrious enough to lose protection under section 7); see also Acting General Counsel Release, supra note 13 (reporting findings of protected concerted activity in four social-media cases).
Although it is true that cases such as Blomley v Ryan and Louth v Diprose might sensically be described as involving naked exploitation or predation on the part of the superior party, I am sceptical that cases like Amadio and Bridgewater v Leahy can realistically be said to portray quite the same level of opprobrious conduct.