The first scheme is provably
secure in the random oracle model and the second scheme is provably
secure in the standard model.
OGCM1 and OGCM-2 are, respectively, provably
secure up to approximately [2.sup.n]/67[(n - 1).sup.2] and [2.sup.n]/67 adversarial queries in the nonce-respecting scenario if the underlying block cipher is a secure pseudorandom permutation (PRP).
In an apology to those individuals, Egan's attorney acknowledged the claims that had been filed were 'untrue and provably
false.' Notwithstanding his track record, this same lawyer is coming after Bryan again.
"Mathematically," the authors claim, "these are solved problems." The 37% rule "is not merely an intuitively satisfying compromise between looking and leaping" but, rather, "the provably
optimal solution" (p.
In "A Protocol for Provably
Secure Authentication of a Tiny Entity to a High Performance Computing One" by S.
Obviously, from the outcome of this team, the future looks very bright with the very bright group and significantly high accomplishments this year, but at the same time, if we don't come in next year thinking what our weaknesses are and what we have to improve, then we'll provably
go backwards,' he said.
Every famous sports figure reported on, living or dead, provably
has been or is.
But it's so provably
true that it's simply no longer expected of us.
They construct a highly efficient and provably
secure PDP technique based entirely on symmetric key cryptography, while not requiring any bulk encryption.
Redgrave said that the International Olympic Committee should have banned the Russian Olympic Committee following Richard McLaren's investigation into state-directed doping, while allowing provably
clean Russians to compete as neutral athletes.
These opinions, confidently proffered by individuals with the shallowest understanding of educational issues, are obviously, provably
, absurd but they are also worryingly widespread.
This boils down to: Whether the person is expressing a subjective opinion or claiming to present objective facts; whether the person was using exaggerated and figurative language that made it clear he or she was giving an opinion rather than presenting objective, factual information; and whether the negative reviewer is presenting statements that are provably