Also found in: Dictionary, Wikipedia.
Related to quasi-judicial: Quasi-Legislative


The action taken and discretion exercised by public administrative agencies or bodies that are obliged to investigate or ascertain facts and draw conclusions from them as the foundation for official actions.

As a general rule, only courts of law have the authority to decide controversies that affect individual rights. One major exception to this general rule is the power of an Administrative Agency to make decisions concerning the rights of parties. An administrative agency is a body of government created by a legislature and charged with supervision and regulation of a particular area of governmental concern. Part of the regulatory power given to an administrative agency is the power of adjudication. Under the Administrative Procedure Act (60 Stat. 237 [5 U.S.C.A. § 551 et seq.]), an agency engages in adjudication when it follows a process for the formulation of an order. With the exception of rule making, any decision by an agency that has a legal effect is a quasi-judicial action.

Complaints against administrative agencies often arise when an agent denies benefits or places restrictions on an individual. For example, a homeowner who seeks to build another structure on her property must obtain approval from a number of administrative agencies. If the local conservation agency refuses to issue a permit for the building of a new structure, the homeowner may appeal this decision in a hearing before the agency's administrative board. The board may hear testimony and examine evidence at the hearing, and then it will decide whether to issue the permit or uphold the agency's refusal.

Quasi-judicial activity is limited to the issues that concern the particular administrative agency. For example, the social security administration may resolve disputes on issues concerning Social Security contributions and benefits, but it may not decide any other issues, even those related to Social Security benefits such as tax, estate, and probate questions.

An administrative agency must hold a formal hearing only when required by statute. A formal hearing is a complete hearing with the presentation of testimony, evidence, and arguments. An informal hearing usually is a simple meeting and discussion between an agent of the agency and the individual affected by the agency's actions. As a general rule, the scope of a hearing depends on the importance of the right at issue. If the Internal Revenue Service attempts to take away a person's homestead, for example, a full hearing would be required. By contrast, when an agent of the Department of Safety issues a small fine for illegal parking, the agency needs to provide only a brief, one-to-one meeting with a hearing officer regarding the issuance of the fine.

Quasi-judicial action by an administrative agency may be appealed to a court of law. With a few exceptions, a plaintiff generally must exhaust all remedies available through an agency before appealing the agency's decision in a case. One notable exception is that a person may appeal directly to a court of law and bypass the quasi-judicial activity of an administrative agency if the agency's remedies would be inadequate. For instance, if the creditors of a failed bank are suing the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, they need not go through the agency's hearings before filing suit in a court of law because the agency has adverse interests to the creditors (Coit Indep. Joint Venture v. FSLIC, 489 U.S. 561, 109 S. Ct. 1361, 103 L. Ed. 2d 602 [1989]).

Further readings

Mashaw, Jerry L., Richard A. Merrill, and Peter M. Shane. 1992. Administrative Law: The American Public Law System; Cases and Materials. 3d ed. St. Paul, Minn.: West.


Administrative Law and Procedure; Bureaucracy; Public Administrative Bodies; Regulation.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.


adj., adv. referring to the actions of an agency, board, or other government entity in which there are hearings, orders, judgments or other activities similar to those conducted by courts. Example: a public utilities hearing on setting telephone company rates is quasi-judicial. (See: judicial, quasi)

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.


proceedings that seem judicial but that are conducted by a person other than a judge - or at least not in his or her judicial capacity.
Collins Dictionary of Law © W.J. Stewart, 2006
References in periodicals archive ?
Eliminate the Distinction Between Legislative and Quasi-Judicial Review for Zoning Actions.
"The Tribunal is a quasi-judicial body and the Equality Authority is an advocacy body.
We use the term quasi-judicial to refer to agency action that is retrospective, is fact-based, and can determine the rights or obligations of selected citizens or stakeholders as distinguished from the general public.
The dissent also noted the number of other contexts in which absolute immunity is afforded in quasi-judicial proceedings.
His logic was that the real estate committee rendered judgments/decisions, hence it was quasi-judicial. But by that interpretation, what board meeting would remain open?
Ninth Circuit cases have read Section 1782 broadly to include "bodies of quasi-judicial or administrative nature" as well as preliminary investigations leading to judicial proceedings.
8 article regarding the Lane County Board of Commissioners' upcoming decision on Eugene Sand & Gravel's River Road gravel pit application revealed some of the politics involved in this quasi-judicial process.
If the chains are found to be abusing their position, the ease will go to the Competition Tribunal, a quasi-judicial governmental body, to request a remedial order.
Following these procedures, the ITC, an independent, quasi-judicial federal agency, will determine whether or not antidumping duties should be imposed.
Gould IV, an experienced labor law scholar at Stanford University, as chairman of the five-member quasi-judicial Board.
Much has been written about the taxpayer's rights to an impartial administrator in the assessment process.(7) At the core of the holdings is the notion that the assessment (as opposed to collection) function is a quasi-judicial one involving discretion about valuation methods, etc.
Finally, Clinton proposes a new quasi-judicial bureaucracy to deal with the welter of legal challenges that will arise along every filament of the national health-care web.

Full browser ?