Review


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Acronyms, Idioms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to Review: review article

Review

To reexamine judicially or administratively; a judicial reconsideration for purposes of correction, for example, the examination of a case by an appellate court.

A bill of review is a proceeding in Equity instituted for the purpose of reversing or correcting the prior judgment of the trial court after the judgment has become final.

review

n. the judicial consideration of a lower court judgment by an appellate court, determining if there were legal errors sufficient to require reversal. The process requires notice of appeal, obtaining a transcript of the trial or hearing at the trial level, obtaining all the pleadings and other documents filed in the original trial, preparation of briefs citing precedents and arguing that there was reversible error. Then the respondent (winner at the trial court) may file a responsive brief, and the appellant (the one appealing the decision) has the chance to file a brief in response to the respondent. The next step is oral argument (if allowed) before the appellate court. Appeals on procedural issues normally do not include oral argument. If the appellate court denies the appeal a rehearing may be requested, but is seldom granted. (See: reversible error, reversal, appeal, appellate court)

REVIEW, practice. A second examination of a matter. For example, by the laws of Pennsylvania, the courts having jurisdiction of the subject may grant an order for a view of a proposed road; the viewers make a report, which when confirmed by the court would authorize the laying out of the same. After this, by statutory provision, the parties may apply for a review, or second examination; and the last viewers may make a different report. For the practice of reviews in chancery, the reader is referred to Bill of Review, and the cases there cited.

References in periodicals archive ?
We sent an email to the chief editors of all journals for peer review proforma.We received 41 proformas (33 general and 8 specialty journals).The salient features of the proformas are summarized in Table-I.
Before this systematic review service model is introduced into a library, a separate implementation team that consists of a few members of the systematic review team, including the team lead and a library administrator, is established to review the model, make any decisions regarding adapting it to meet their library's goals, and provide input about the model prior to the chosen implementation date.
On the plus side for developers, using Apple's official interface for reviews also may increase the response rate because the review prompt allows the user to leave a review without leaving the app.
Not surprisingly, several of the major players within the OA environment are also involved in open peer review. After first experimenting in this space, they quickly became advocates.
- Watchers can join a review any time if they want to add comments to code.
STAYBRIDGE SUITES 3 21 Keel Wharf, Liverpool L3 4FN 'Excellent' reviews: 926 'Terrible' reviews: 10 Staybridge Suites has over 920 'excellent' reviews - with the most recent recommending the hotel based on its "great location and good value for money."
The Cochrane review reporting guidelines on method are more inclined to rigor in the methods used for example it requires to provide methods on sub-group analysis to deal with heterogeneity of outcomes and sensitivity analysis to check the robustness of results.
Fake online reviews mislead consumers and hurt Australian businesses.
For California firms, an extension for peer review is not an extension to report peer review results to the California Board of Accountancy.
BSI officials said performing the review in person expedites the process by eliminating communication through mail, email, fax or phone.
Just as practitioners should not rule out providing peer review services because of the size of their firm, they should not think that the nature of their accounting practice precludes them from becoming a peer reviewer.